1999-D - This one could be an exceptional one. I can't find it anywhere.

[59burk19]

Thanks Bob. Do you have any idea how such a significant scratch may have not removed copper and exposed zinc? That's the only part of this that I don't...

[59burk19]

Update to original post. This does not appear to be a DD as viewing with side lighting the extra (column?) appears to be recessed....

[59burk19]

Your feedback will be appreciated. I'm guessing this one might be worth something?

...

[59burk19]

Thanks for letting me know, but this does lead to some confusion on my part because it is very similar, but a larger (not as minor?) version of Wexler...

[59burk19]

Similar to 1998D WWDR-009 but appears to extend down further - from the knees to a bit past the foot.


...

[59burk19]

Bob, a bit more of your expertise, if you don't mind. A few days ago, I posted: 1986 D Reverse New Discovery? 02-18-2021, 03:41 PM. In this case,...

[59burk19]

Thank you, Bob. That is exactly the type of feedback I need. Being a novice, it's hard to know where to draw the line....

[59burk19]

Comments appreciated. This one is small but to my novice eye it looks like it may be doubling (undiscovered).

...

[59burk19]

Looks to me like minor doubling, maybe not enough to worry about. To me, it looks like we have an extra step in first bay and doubling of the top of the...

[59burk19]

Thank you! Very informative!...

[59burk19]

I'm too much of a novice to even guess if this is something of significance. Please offer your thoughts. ...