russellhome
01-30-2008, 06:45 PM
Now that Mike Diamond's article is out in ErrorScope, I though I'd post the color photos here. This is the same coin as seen on pages 28-31 in the current issue of Errorscope.
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD5.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD6.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD7.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD8.jpg
It did a number on the incused designer initials... SS became SS SS. The photo above compares this coin (left) with a coin with moderate MD (center) and with a Sac dollar with no MD (right).
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD4.jpg
If you want bigger, here are links to even larger photos...
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev4.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv4.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv5.jpg
If you are interested in reading the debate as to whether this coin was double struck or simply extreme mechanical doubling, here is the link to the coppercoins post...
http://www.coppercoins.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3263
Thanks for doing the article Mike. It was great -- and the photos turned out much better than the CW article -- as you said they would. I still have not attempted to have it slabbed as double struck. I've been waiting to see if any more turned up. I figure that if it did turn out to be MD, many more would have been cranked out with a similar degree of doubling (just as I saw with Kansas quarters). As extreme as this is, they'd have turned up on eBay by now if they exist in quantity. I've been watching, and as far as I know, this one is unique.
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD5.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD6.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD7.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD8.jpg
It did a number on the incused designer initials... SS became SS SS. The photo above compares this coin (left) with a coin with moderate MD (center) and with a Sac dollar with no MD (right).
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSMSdolMDD4.jpg
If you want bigger, here are links to even larger photos...
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_rev4.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv1.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv2.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv3.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv4.jpg
http://www.idsimis.com/photos2/2007PSacSMS_obv5.jpg
If you are interested in reading the debate as to whether this coin was double struck or simply extreme mechanical doubling, here is the link to the coppercoins post...
http://www.coppercoins.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3263
Thanks for doing the article Mike. It was great -- and the photos turned out much better than the CW article -- as you said they would. I still have not attempted to have it slabbed as double struck. I've been waiting to see if any more turned up. I figure that if it did turn out to be MD, many more would have been cranked out with a similar degree of doubling (just as I saw with Kansas quarters). As extreme as this is, they'd have turned up on eBay by now if they exist in quantity. I've been watching, and as far as I know, this one is unique.