Tweet
My poor eyes, is this still considered a close am, it's got all the characteristics of a close am variety. But that's not near touching. Is this why it looks like it's possible being a wide am because of the corrosion. Hmmm any suggestions would be great thank you. PXL_20251020_172912772.jpg PXL_20251020_171619499.jpg PXL_20251020_173356989.jpg
-
-
In my opinion, the left leg of the M suffers from die deterioration. Its much thinner than the right side. You could add a post in the coneca services area under attributions, to see what their opinion might be.
Here is an artcle on the known, documented wide/close AM varieties:
Last edited by MintErrors; 10-20-2025, 07:20 PM.
My signature block :
Three helpful posts:
How to take better photos with a Cellphone:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...th-a-cellphone
RPM or DDO question? Help us help YOU:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...lp-us-help-you
What Forum to post your coin questions:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...t-forum-to-use
Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment