Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1963d...?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Seeindubl
    Seeindubl
    • Oct 2007
    • 35
    #1

    1963d...?

    Don't know if there is anything significant here...saw some doubling but having a problem identifying worthwhile from ummm "junk". Opinions appreciated.
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
  • JamesWiles
    JamesWiles
    • Aug 2007
    • 223
    #2
    Looks like light die cracks with maybe a small chip by the 3. Could be lamination. I just can't tell for sure from the blurry photos.
    CONECA 20th Century Die Variety Attributer

    Comment

    • Seeindubl
      Seeindubl
      • Oct 2007
      • 35
      #3
      Originally posted by JamesWiles View Post
      Looks like light die cracks with maybe a small chip by the 3. Could be lamination. I just can't tell for sure from the blurry photos.
      Thank you Mr. Wiles, yes photo quality is something I'm still struggling with.

      Comment

      • 3˘nicker
        • Oct 2007
        • 128
        #4
        from what i can see the 6 looks a little stretched to the SE and a separetion line on the top part of the three but again pic quality
        Jimmy Ehrhart
        previous member of CONECA and C.F.C.C.

        Comment

        • foundinrolls
          • Aug 2007
          • 228
          #5
          maybe you can try to get some clearer pictures. I see what may be extra thickness on the 9, 6 and 3.

          Thanks,

          Bill

          Comment

          • Seeindubl
            Seeindubl
            • Oct 2007
            • 35
            #6
            I will give it a try Bill, I'm having difficulty with the shadow and lighting (glare) I have even tried natural lighting but am still doing something wrong. Back to the loupe.

            Comment

            • nuts4errorcoins
              • Nov 2007
              • 2
              #7
              pics

              try using 10x loop over digital lens with no flash works great for me! and 15x on lens than zoom in.... for great details
              somtimes the angle of light effect the details in the image

              Comment

              Previous template Next
              Working...
              X