1938-S Lincoln Cent RPM?
Collapse
X
-
Looks like Strike Doubling (Machine Doubling).Attached FilesKen Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
-
-
Many Thanks Ken. Always appreciate the help from one of our experts. I am an engineer by trade, but as a bit of a novice at "error hunting" I thought that if I laid out the logic (much like a typical root cause analysis in a failure investigation) I employed thinking that this might be a RPM then you could help me understand the flaws in my reasoning. First and foremost I discounted the machine doubling due to the fact there was no other such evidence on any of the devices or the date...only the mintmark. It would seem odd to me that out of all the possibilities of machine doubling that just the little mintmark would be the victim with so many other opportunities in very close proximity. Then I thought that possibly I was looking at a die chip or wear on the mintmark only....but I discounted that once I saw how nicely the upper part of the underlying S was formed. And then the mintmark had a "tilted" appearance to me rather that just an offset. With multiple factors in play I concluded that just maybe this was an RPM. I realize the coin's condition is sub par making the evaluation a bit more difficult but I would be anxious to understand where I failed...it will certainly help my learning curve! Many thanks again..... BobLast edited by flyank; 04-01-2016, 02:44 PM.Bob
CONECA Member
Comment
-
-
Bob,
Strike Doubling (MD) often only affects the MM because it is out in the open by itself. I also think there is some on the outer upper curve of the 9. Also, the upper loop of the "origian" 9 appears a bit thinned and that outside it seems flat. Also, no RPM like this listed for this heavily searched date.Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
-
Very good Ken...and much appreciated as always! I think my biggest take-away is to not focus on older coins as you say "heavily searched" dates since they have already been found and documented. That will save me time for sure rather than thinking I have something possibly new and worth considering. Doing this takes considerable time and patience and now knowing when to "pass" is good time management. Thank you for helping a beginner ......!Bob
CONECA Member
Comment
-
-
You never know though when you might find something new.Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
Comment