1992 Lincoln sent Chin issue

[Conan62]

2024_0612_155253_025.jpeg 2024_0612_155153_022.jpeg IMG_6134.jpeg Good afternoon, this 1992 Lincoln sent is in great condition, but there seems to be some type of anomaly protruding from above his chin. I could not find anything in my research. I appreciate any feedback you may have.

[Conan62]

Sorry for the typo. Lincoln Cent

[occnumis2021]

did your research take you across the 4-5 speicaty variety/'lincoln sites out there? the top ones stay pretty up-to-date with listings.

[Conan62]

I really try looking before I bother anyone on this forum. I only have two sites that I can check on. Is there a link to other sites on this forum? I appreciate you guys and girls more each day when I realize how little I know. Sometimes I think I have something. I just want to verify it and can’t.

[occnumis2021]

probably no site links on the forum (not certain tho) and i'm still not 100% certain on how they feel about us posting about other sites. i think i've been walking a line?

i'll post some here and remove them if i get a slap on the hand.

coppercoins
linconcentresource
varietyvista (obviously)
doubleddie (obviously)
i think there is another one but it is escaping me at the moment.

i did a quick glance at V.V.& D.D. and didn't see any chin doubling (from what i saw) but perhaps you wanna add this to the attribution services or one of the appropriate official threads? didn't see any known ddo for the year/mm listed either.

OOPS, did a double check and i think i found this on D.D.? - scroll down this page - http://doubleddie.com/700034.html

[Conan62]

Thank you. I was aware I had checked all but one of those websites and found nothing pertaining to this particular issue. I do see the issue on the site link that you graciously provided. I am new at collecting, does the coin have to have all of the listed doubling to be considered WDDO-002 or is one or more acceptable?

[occnumis2021]

Thank you. I was aware I had checked all but one of those websites and found nothing pertaining to this particular issue. I do see the issue on the site link that you graciously provided. I am new at collecting, does the coin have to have all of the listed doubling to be considered WDDO-002 or is one or more acceptable?

tbh, idk. i didn't look to see if there was more than one and also to see if there were secondary diagnostics provided.

[occnumis2021]

Thank you. I was aware I had checked all but one of those websites and found nothing pertaining to this particular issue. I do see the issue on the site link that you graciously provided. I am new at collecting, does the coin have to have all of the listed doubling to be considered WDDO-002 or is one or more acceptable?

if you didn't see (i forgot about it) there are links in a section for other sites at the bottom of the main forum page list.

so i presume here going forward it isn't a problem to link to those sites throughout the various appropriate sections of this whole forum. yay!

https://board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links/53399-numismatic-site-links