Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Help With Identifying What These Are

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ddahl
    • Jan 2021
    • 58

    Help With Identifying What These Are

    I found these cents during CRH-ing and would like some input. Thank You!
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 8 photos.
  • jcuve
    Lead attributer
    • Apr 2008
    • 1497

    #2
    These are in the wrong area (that's why no one saw them). I will move the thread to the general area.
    Jason Cuvelier

    CONECA
    Lead attributer

    Comment

    • jcuve
      Lead attributer
      • Apr 2008
      • 1497

      #3
      The first coin has a type of die wear where the design from the opposing die face starts to wear the design into the other face leaving a ghost like impression often mimicking a die clash. It is a type of low grade error.

      The second was damaged, probably sandwiched in a c-clamp against another coin.
      Jason Cuvelier

      CONECA
      Lead attributer

      Comment

      • Ddahl
        • Jan 2021
        • 58

        #4
        Thanks Jason, I appreciate it. I am still getting used to things here.

        Comment

        • jcuve
          Lead attributer
          • Apr 2008
          • 1497

          #5
          Originally posted by Ddahl View Post
          Thanks Jason, I appreciate it. I am still getting used to things here.
          Take your time. Error and variety numismatics is complicated, but doable...
          Jason Cuvelier

          CONECA
          Lead attributer

          Comment

          • Nfoster76
            Banned
            • Apr 2021
            • 187

            #6
            Looks like PMD. But I’d like to see the 1946 S mint mark under magnification. Looks promising for an RPM or S/D OMM.

            Comment

            Working...
            X