Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

acid treatment...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • acid treatment...

    i just purchased some buffalo;s that have been acid treat to enhance the date. is that a bad thing?

    what acid do you used to do such a thing? is there any particular method to do it? thanks

  • #2
    As with all "enhancements" made outside the MINT, it makes the coin completely noncollectable and in this case basically worth a nickel.

    Not only was this acid treatment applied to Buffalo nickels, but also to the Liberty nickel as well (I have examples of both).

    I am sorry for the bad news and hopefully it was not to an expensive mistake.

    BJ Neff
    Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

    Comment


    • #3
      really? the whole coin wasnt treated. just where the date is. the coins were partical date....hard to read and someone treated them with acid i guess to make the date easier to read. the coin package states....acid date. the actual coin looks like any other. you can notice a circle around the date where the acid was applied. but really only worth a nickel? nah i didnt pay hardly anything for them...but every single one i recieved is a key date. i have about 5 1913 type 1's


      if they are only worth a nickel i would like the find a 3legged buffalo that be nice.

      Comment


      • #4


        i just took this picture to try and show what i mean.

        Comment


        • #5
          I am glad that the price for these was low, so your loss was not great.

          Even though just a small portion of the coin was treated, it is considered deliberate damage and thus shunned by collectors. This practice of date enhancement is in the same category as pseudo clashes (transferring of design through the use of two coins in a vise); they are meant to entice a person to buy something of little or no value.

          I am sorry, but even after viewing the coin, I still maintain that it is worth just a nickel.

          BJ Neff
          Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

          Comment


          • #6
            eh ohwell....i just use them as fillers.

            Comment


            • #7
              Acid treated buffalos

              At work a few weeks ago, I found a date-worn Buffalo Nickel in a roll of nickels; luckily it was a Denver coin. I ended up buying the Nic-A-Date for it and found it to be a 1914-D. Would it still pretty much be worthless even though it's the second-most expensive Denver date (which is not a variety)?

              Comment


              • #8
                Any coin that has been altered out side the MINT, which includes acid treatment, enhancement, reconstruction (there are exceptions with some rare holed coins that have been repaired) are in general considered non-collectible and thus worth face value.

                BJ Neff
                Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

                Comment


                • #9
                  i dunno why but i dont agree with only worth face value...i think there is several collectors out there that would pay more than face value for one that has been acid treated...me being one of them

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X