Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Regular strike?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Popsiclman
    • Apr 2023
    • 107

    Regular strike?

    I have a 1957 Philadelphia Mint set, all coins still in the original cellophane. Are these coins considered regular strike coins?
    I've also seen proof sets in OGP with the S mintmark and other, raw coins described as "regular strike" coins with an S mint mark. How would I tell the difference?
    Thanks!
  • occnumis2021
    NumisScholar
    • May 2021
    • 1443

    #2
    you are kinda asking a question that has a few answers because you're covering a lot of numismatics with the way you are wording it.

    other than sms, patterns, dmpl etc, there is no confusing proof vs business strikes(unless strongly circulated or damaged) and unfortunately, both do contain the S mintmark (other mm on proof&business strike coins may exist).

    regular strike = business strikes = intended for circulation/commerce

    proof strike = intended to be collected

    there are proof like business strikes that can be a bit tricky sometimes but those are exceptions.

    really it is best to do a case-by-case.
    coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

    Comment

    • Popsiclman
      • Apr 2023
      • 107

      #3
      Still a little confused but thank you. I appreciate it!

      Comment

      • occnumis2021
        NumisScholar
        • May 2021
        • 1443

        #4
        not that it is related to your inquiry but i will add this addendum about there being no confusing business strikes vs proofs: proof dies were "often" used afterwards for business strikes and has caused great confusion and study but really isn't much related to lincolns and such, mostly 1800s coinage with some exceptions of course.

        after rereading your inquiry, "I've also seen proof sets in OGP with the S mintmark and other, raw coins described as "regular strike" coins with an S mint mark."

        if you put a proof coin next to a business strike one, 99.9% of the time there should be no confusion as they are JUST that different in appearance.
        coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

        Comment

        • MintErrors
          Minterrors.org
          • Jun 2015
          • 3597

          #5
          Originally posted by Popsiclman View Post
          I have a 1957 Philadelphia Mint set, all coins still in the original cellophane. Are these coins considered regular strike coins?
          I've also seen proof sets in OGP with the S mintmark and other, raw coins described as "regular strike" coins with an S mint mark. How would I tell the difference?
          Thanks!


          You mentioned Mint Set, if it is a mint set, they are all business strikes, not proofs.
          Proofs were issued in an envelope, a separate purchase, typically one type coin (1c, 5c, 10c,25c.50c) in a single cello.
          The Proofs are typically very shiny, so much so that in a reflecting light, it should almost blind you. That effect can be dulled down if the coins have toning or are really milky looking.

          S mint marks can be a bit tricky to understand, BUT, there are a few years in the 1960's that there was a S business strike and a S proof. Google knows all.


          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment

          Working...
          X