Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1945 Walking Half Initials - Are weak initials considered missing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rick Sapp
    • Jul 2023
    • 15

    1945 Walking Half Initials - Are weak initials considered missing?

    Hello folks. Another educational opportunity for the newbie... So in 1945 the mint produced a Walking Liberty Half Dollar without designers initials on the reverse. Are weak initials considered missing initials? Here are a couple pictures of what I recently found. The condition of the half I have is G4-G6, but I have to get REAL close to see the impression of the "A" (above the dark dot in the top image). The "W" is almost non-existant. Most of the examples I find online are not super close so I was hoping someone could enlighten me.
    S20231024_0003.jpg
    S20230708_0001.jpg
    Anyway, I welcome your thoughts and comments.

    Thanks
    Rick
    Attached Files
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3597

    #2
    Weak initials are just that. The problem with this issue is they fade with wear. The letters themselves are pretty small. They can easily be filled with small fragments of debris from the hundreds of thousands of planchets that are struck by each pair of working dies.

    In my opinion :

    It could also be a grease filled issue, but again, the only way to prove this is by being able to identify some blotchy style patterns around the affected area.

    I do not believe a third party grading service will recognize too many missing designers initials, because every working die starts out with them. It's more of a novelty issue than one to get rich off of.

    I think it was 1969, a year where some people claimed working dies didn't have designers initials, and even had the Memorial Building with a floating roof. The floating roof was no more than an overzealous mint worker polishing the die with practically erased the single line connecting the design together.

    Again as for designers initials on the 1969 cent, they could have too been subjected to debris, grease or other material or issues, like that over zealous mint worker.

    Happy hunting.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment

    • Rick Sapp
      • Jul 2023
      • 15

      #3
      Kinda what I thought. Thanks for the info. Back in the silver stack with this one.....

      Comment

      Working...
      X