Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1987 LMC Error on Reverse?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1987 LMC Error on Reverse?

    Hi. I'm new to the Forum and making my first post. Thanks for this resource.

    I’ve been intrigued by the gouge on the reverse of this coin. It could just be my eyes or misinterpretation but it seems like the letters T and E are formed on top of the indentation not flattened or pushed to the side as I would expect from PMD.

    I did post this on another coin site and it was suggested that I seek help here. Two opinions were that it could be a struck through or planchet error. One person pointed out that there is a second area of interest above the monument that I hadn’t even noticed!

    I’d appreciate your opinions on this.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Emma67; 08-02-2024, 02:03 PM.

  • #2
    i would lean towards stirke-through but can't be 100% from the images which aren't terrible but the obv looks suspicious to me.
    coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi and thanks for responding. While I've had 90% of my coins for over 40 years, I've just recently begun learning about how to evaluate and grade them. I was leaning toward a strike-through also. Would you be kind enough to explain what you see on the obverse that looks suspicious? I haven't noticed anything that caught my eye.
      Thanks again for your help

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Emma67 View Post
        Hi and thanks for responding. While I've had 90% of my coins for over 40 years, I've just recently begun learning about how to evaluate and grade them. I was leaning toward a strike-through also. Would you be kind enough to explain what you see on the obverse that looks suspicious? I haven't noticed anything that caught my eye.
        Thanks again for your help
        idk, it just looks off but very well could just be the lighting. it does weird things to the appearances of coins in images and sometimes in person.

        happy to hear you are delving down into your collection more. you'll probably come out with more questions than answers. numismatics is the deep end of the pool.
        coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I will offer my opinion on this. In order for the letters to be struck normally, it would more than likely have had to be a flat surface. Then, some how or some where either immediately after the strike or afterwards, several layers of lamination was torn off. To me, that would explain the semi normal looking strike and the small crater as well. I will look closer at it when I return to the home office.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment

          Working...
          X