Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1998 Proof Cent Error

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OregonBob
    • Aug 2008
    • 5

    1998 Proof Cent Error

    I have attached photos of a 1998 Lincoln Cent proof. The proof is still in the US Mint case. It shows a broken column on the left side of the Memorial, and a large chip from the column directly to the right of Lincoln. Any thoughts, given that it is a proof, regarding causes, and/or value?
    Attached Files
  • diamond
    • Jul 2007
    • 2040

    #2
    I don't know the cause. Value is probably limited.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment

    • Tuebits
      Tuebits
      • Feb 2008
      • 301

      #3
      Seen them also

      Hi Bob,

      Take a look at the pictures in my post below. It has an incomplet column also, along with the Machine doubling.

      In my limited experience, I've Know of only two: yours and mine. Only in proof sets.

      Tuebits

      Comment

      • OregonBob
        • Aug 2008
        • 5

        #4
        Very similar: 10 years later

        The location of the damages is amazingly similar, considering they are 10 years apart, and both proof sets. Any thoughts from the rest of you, especially Mr. Diamond. Could it be a defective die, still in use 10 years later?

        Bob

        Comment

        • diamond
          • Jul 2007
          • 2040

          #5
          I don't know what post or photos tuebits is referring to. Your coin appears to show a striking error, not a die error.
          Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

          Comment

          • OregonBob
            • Aug 2008
            • 5

            #6
            Follow-up

            Tuebit's photos are in a prior post of his. If you search for all posts by him, you will find them.

            Thank you for being an active part of this forum.

            Bob

            Comment

            Working...
            X