Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dr. Mary Edward’s Walker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dr. Mary Edward’s Walker

    So I found this quarter 2024 Dr. Mary Edwards and I have searched for this variety and I’ve done my research and I found nothing out there. That is like this. I do believe it is a third eye on Dr. Mary’s cheek, but other than that, I do not know, I’m new to collecting so please help my name is Jammie
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 3 photos.
    Last edited by JammieLee; 10-11-2024, 11:27 PM. Reason: I have more photos but can’t seem to upload it just says error so I had to just take a pic with my phone camera

  • #2
    Looks to be a bag hit.

    Comment


    • #3
      agree. looks like a quintessintial reed hit, probably in a bag.
      coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah the pics are bad and don’t give it the right look under a microscope u can tell it’s not a bag hit .. How can I up load pics it will not let me ?

        Comment


        • #5
          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
          This gallery has 3 photos.

          Comment


          • #6
            100% a reed hit. you can see the beginning of reeds opposite both sides of the divot. seen a million of them. even if it isn't and JUST looks exactly like a reed hit, it is not an error or collectable nor will there be another one out there exactly like that unless someone intentionally did it and made more.

            a reed can hit a coin out of a bag and create a mark like that but most of the time (outisde human interference) it happens in bags. probably even ballistic bags which literally weigh like a ton.

            i've seen em in person, they are freakin huge. be VERY easy for bottom-baggers (coins) to get all kinds of wacky things done to them, even way back when in morgan/peace canvas bags.
            coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Ok then explain why it looks just like the eye of the outher 2 I’m confused if u where to line them up to the eye it would be a perfect match .. I’ve looked up the. Reed hit.. I guess u must see it. In person under a microscope because that is a mint error it looks just like the. Outher two eyes explain that please

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree, it's not a third eye, it's nearly impossible for this to happen. All working dies are made from the same master die and IF it was it should have affected all the other working dies as well. In addition, working dies do not strike just a single coin. They typically stike over 300,000 quarters per working die on average. Where are all the others?

                That area is not even close to the same shape. You can debunk that by creating an photo overlay and super imposing an eye over that damaged area.
                I am not going to do the overlay, because it's honestly not even a slim possibility.

                People in here offer their opinions. Most have decades of experience and know the minting process. Feel free to ask questions, but accepting these opinions will season a person faster and people will continue to answer posts. If they feel they need to explain themselves too far in something that is not what they believe it is, then they may not respond any more to those type posts.

                We work as a team here. There is a lot of give and less take for a select few. We appreciate your interest in errors and we hope to help you out in the future.
                Last edited by MintErrors; 10-21-2024, 11:39 PM.
                Gary Kozera
                Website: https://MintErrors.org

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JammieLee View Post
                  Ok then explain why it looks just like the eye of the outher 2 I’m confused if u where to line them up to the eye it would be a perfect match .. I’ve looked up the. Reed hit.. I guess u must see it. In person under a microscope because that is a mint error it looks just like the. Outher two eyes explain that please


                  The problem with is is..... you see it in your view and three others don't see it in the photos. We cant explain something that we typically do not see. We see it as a bag mark/ reeding hit. You see it differently. Since we dont agree with the extra eye scenario, we cant "assume" what you see is the answer....At that point it becomes a hypothetical situation and we would be guessing.

                  I don't know about others on this forum but in my opinion, I call them like I see them, not how some one else sees things.
                  Gary Kozera
                  Website: https://MintErrors.org

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X