Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1972 D LMC Phantom Jacket Lapel/Tie/Vest Error Strike

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • searching4errors
    Fran
    • Nov 2007
    • 101

    1972 D LMC Phantom Jacket Lapel/Tie/Vest Error Strike

    Hi again everyone...

    I have a 1972 D Lincoln Memorial Cent which has a strike (I think) error on the front of Lincoln's jacket lapel/tie/vest area which I call the Phantom strike error or is it a die error? Is this very common and is it caused by a filled die? If not, what caused it? Thanks in advance for information.
    Fran
    Attached Files
  • diamond
    • Jul 2007
    • 2040

    #2
    It's intentional die abrasion (die polishing). The die was abraded to remove superficial damage, like clash marks. Cents between 1972 and 1974 show especially heavy abrasion from overzealous mint technicians. Intentional die abrasion is quite common.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment

    • searching4errors
      Fran
      • Nov 2007
      • 101

      #3
      Thanks for your reply Mike. I thought surely I'd found something unusual out of all the copper cents that I've collected. I've never run across one quite like this one. How can one tell that the abrasion is intentional rather than normal die wear?

      Thanks again Mike
      Fran

      Comment

      • diamond
        • Jul 2007
        • 2040

        #4
        Intentional die abrasion will often show fine, raised lines running in numerous directions. But even if the lines are not apparent, you'll find that low-lying parts of the design are missing and other parts of the design are attenuated (thinned). Die wear shows none of this.
        Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

        Comment

        • searching4errors
          Fran
          • Nov 2007
          • 101

          #5
          Thanks once again, Mike. I'll check more closely on questionable coins to see if I can detect these marks.

          Fran

          Comment

          Working...
          X