Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1976 Netherlands 10 cents showing doubling.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1976 Netherlands 10 cents showing doubling.

    After referring to J.T. Stanton's article on doubling i still need help in determining if this is just die fatigue. There is definate separation in the serifs of T in cents and many other areas that suggest possible die doubling.
    Attached Files

  • #2
    It's hard for me to tell, as your close-up photos are a bit blurred. Some of the letters and numbers resemble a doubled die while others aren't that convincing. In your first photo the "1" is strongly doubled in an E-W direction while the adjacent "9" shows no doubling. That would seem to undermine the notion that this is a doubled die. The the doubling on the "1" and the "76" seem to be in opposite directions, which would also conflict with a doubled die. However, I will defer to the opinion of our more proficient variety experts.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment


    • #3
      As Mike pointed out, there are a lot of inconsistencies that are present to steer it away from being called a doubled die. I also question the doubling as being caused by die deterioration without seeing the coin in hand. Die deterioration doubling can cause split serifs and very convincing doubling of the design elements. This may be the case here since it seems to affect the outer design elements. As the coin ages, the die deterioration doubling becomes more pronounced, while the true doubled die becomes mushy with age.

      BJ Neff
      Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thank you both BJ and Mike for taking the time to discuss my coin.

        Comment

        Working...
        X