Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Abraded 1989-D Designer Initials?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ilikeikes
    • Apr 2008
    • 71

    Abraded 1989-D Designer Initials?

    I'm always on the hunt for the 1988 and 1989 transitional cents, with the FG designer intial issues....this one appears to be an abraded version??...there is no inward serif on the G...since the upper curve of the G does not extend to the perimeter of the initial, I don't think this is the super-rare transitional. I'm a bit surprised the transitionals are not in the cherrypickers guide.
    Opinions welcome on this cent.
    Thanks
    Cal
    Attached Files
  • PatrickA
    • Nov 2009
    • 84

    #2
    looks like a regular 89

    looks like a regular 89.

    so far,no 89's have been found with the straight G.

    Comment

    • coin-crazy
      • Aug 2010
      • 528

      #3
      I just found a 1989 cent with the abraded designer initials last night! Whats the big deal about them?
      Still the best "Nickel Trail Die Hunter". 2013 ((MIKEE)) T.Davis

      Comment

      • wavysteps
        • Aug 2007
        • 1925

        #4
        Not to much. Designer's initals have been known to be missing on the memorial cent due to abrading the die and also from being grease filled.

        It is an oddity and does command a small premium if the right person does want it.

        That is the normal designer's initials for the 1989 reverse.

        BJ Neff
        Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

        Comment

        • coin-crazy
          • Aug 2010
          • 528

          #5
          Well here are my pics...1989 abraded variety 001.jpg
          Attached Files
          Still the best "Nickel Trail Die Hunter". 2013 ((MIKEE)) T.Davis

          Comment

          • jzacknae
            • Aug 2010
            • 1

            #6
            this is a pic of a 1989 and I swear it looks like the 1988
            Attached Files

            Comment

            • coin-crazy
              • Aug 2010
              • 528

              #7
              [QUOTE=jzacknae;9559]this is a pic of a 1989 and I swear it looks like the 1988[/QUOTE
              Your pic looks pretty good to me .. What you think about my pic? Nobody yet said a word about it..
              Still the best "Nickel Trail Die Hunter". 2013 ((MIKEE)) T.Davis

              Comment

              • Novicetoerr
                • Apr 2008
                • 595

                #8
                Hi,

                I'm just regular audience here, but I've spent lots of inspection time on this type. My humble comment (my apologies ahead if experts say I'm wrong) is over-abraded 1989 initial. The primary reference you could look at is the front edge of the upper loop of 'G' which is "behind" the front edge of the horizontal bar of the 'G'. The 1988 initial has edges of the 'G' aligned
                (if not over) but can not be behind. (Sorry, I'm not familiar with the terminologoes yet.)

                I know the experts will help provide the clarification.

                NVTE

                Comment

                • jcuve
                  Lead attributer
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 1497

                  #9
                  All the pictures here point to clear die abrasion.

                  At this point I cannot see a listing being created for a '89 with reverse of '88 unless the example was gem BU, a EDS to EMDS example with no signs of abrasion or having been Struck Through a (Grease) Filled Die.
                  Jason Cuvelier

                  CONECA
                  Lead attributer

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X