Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1935 S Washington No Designer Initials

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1935 S Washington No Designer Initials

    I recently purchased an MS65 quality 1935 S Wash. quarter. I already had an AU58 grade 35 S. Both have no designer initials. I at first assumed this was due to a filled die. But, on close inspection, I find that the area where the initials should be(on the obv. neck), there were die scratches that were long, consistant, and undistorted where the initials should have been. It would seem to me, that if they were filled dies, that the area would be slightly lumpy and or distorted slightly, and would lack the above die scratches. Filled dies are errors, but if the mint left the initials off by mistake, then I believe it would be a die variety. I have not been able to read much of anything about missing designer initials in the Wash. Quarter series, and wonder if anyone can comment about this or enlighten us a little. Thanks. Coin Detective.

  • #2
    If it's not a filled die, then it's most probably a case of intentional die abrasion. This sometimes removes the designer's initials on Lincoln cents and Kennedy halves.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the reply Mike. If I understand the concept correctly, intentional abraison would be like sanding down a part of the die to remove imperfections, etc. to improve the die quality. The part of the die that would create the designers initials during the strike, would actually be incuse or recessed to create the high spot resulting in the initials. Wouldn't a lot of metal from the die have to be removed to completely remove the initials?

      Comment


      • #4
        Not necessarily. It is dependent on the age of the die as well. As the die ages, the design element tend to flatten or become less thick. Abrading the die sharpens the design detail, however, it also again makes that design element less thick. Two primary examples of this are the 1922 no D Lincoln cent and the 3 and 3 1/2 legged Buffalo nickels, where the design element was abraded so much, that the design was completely or partially removed.

        BJ Neff
        Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you wavy steps for your reply. The replys still beg an answer to the question. Maybe stated slightly different, can an attributor make an assessment if the lack of initials is due filling, abraiding or left off?

          Comment

          Working...
          X