Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1990-P Planchet error ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 931louis
    • May 2008
    • 34

    1990-P Planchet error ?

    Is this a planchet error, The grooves thru the lower bust are the deepest and go deeper then the feild and still have the copper plating. Theres no zinc showing thru any of the grooves.
    Attached Files
  • diamond
    • Jul 2007
    • 2040

    #2
    Puzzling. If it was pre-strike damage or any kind of planchet defect, I'd expect it to continue onto the design rim. Not only that, but it should be strongest on the design rim, since the effective striking pressure is lowest here. But the grooves stop at the design rim. The letters IN G seem to be severely affected. If this was a planchet defect or pre-strike damage, I would have expected them to strike up better. On the other hand, the grooves on the face seem to be pre-strike as they continue uninterrupted across Lincoln's face. If it was post-strike damage, you'd expect the grooves to be strongest over the high spots.

    I've not seen an effect like this before. My hunch is that it is a genuine error. I'd be happy to take a closer look at it for you.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment

    • 931louis
      • May 2008
      • 34

      #3
      Thanks Mike
      Let me know were to send it and ill get it in the mail.
      Louis

      Comment

      • diamond
        • Jul 2007
        • 2040

        #4
        Contact me at mdia1@aol.com and I'll give you my home address.
        Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

        Comment

        • coin-crazy
          • Aug 2010
          • 528

          #5
          Looks interesting, something I'd find and post..I hope it turns out to be a good error..Nice find by the way!!!
          Still the best "Nickel Trail Die Hunter". 2013 ((MIKEE)) T.Davis

          Comment

          • diamond
            • Jul 2007
            • 2040

            #6
            It's a genuine planchet error. I've never seen this kind of defect/damage before. I can't fathom why it doesn't continue onto the design rim. But all other evidence is consistent with a genuine error.

            All I can think of is that the zinc strip or a zinc cent blank was deeply scratched, and the upsetting process smoothed out the scratches along the perimeter. However, this would primarily smooth the edge and not the apex of the proto-rim. But it's the best I can do to explain this pattern. It's clear that the copper plating was applied after the planchet was damaged.
            Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

            Comment

            • 931louis
              • May 2008
              • 34

              #7
              Thanks Mike for looking at this coin for me and confirming that it is a planchet error, thats what I was hoping to hear.

              Comment

              Working...
              X