Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1977 D 25C straight clip, partial collar?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1977 D 25C straight clip, partial collar?

    Hello everyone,

    I'm new to the forum, so please be gentle. I just bought this error coin, and there is some verdigris on the surface and on the raw straight clip. I was wondering if I should send it to NCS for conservation, plus grading by NGC? Or should I just leave it alone? Also included was a "COA" from Error Trends Magazine from 1973, plus the original envelope it was sent in. Could get some advice, please? To conserve it? To grade it? See my pics. I appreciate any advice. Thanks.

    Brad
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Welcome to the Forum, Brad. I would characaterize this coin as a broadstrike on a straight-clipped planchet. While there is a trace of collar contact on the reverse face, it represents a simple grazing of the top of the collar. I see no need to "conserve" it. It looks good as-is. As to grading, this is a personal decision. I'd value this coin at about $75, so grading would significantly erode its bottom line.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by diamond View Post
      I'd value this coin at about $75, so grading would significantly erode its bottom line.
      Mike, thanks so much for the response and evaluation. Well, I paid more than $75 for it. I thought a multiple error would be worth more, but I'm a neophyte when it comes to errors. Education is not free, and I think I just got educated!

      Anybody else want to chime in? Tell me a lie to make me feel better? (I prefer the truth, though. . . .) Thanks.

      Brad

      Comment

      Working...
      X