As speculation I interpret these two coins being related in the sense the "first" coin was struck with the breakage of the die creating an indentation very similar in size, position and shape to the second coin where the die breakage cleared the die and the second coin was struck with a slightly larger "Cud".
I compared the two coins in the characteristics of the letters and some surface marks. The characteristics of the date (1964) seem to be extremmely similar ( the shape of the 1 top point flag, the ending of the 9, the fatness of the top of the 6, and similarity mof the 4). Monticello on the reverse has extremely similar characteristics on both coins (the O has a slight shift to the right in the inner circle, the N has a shift to the right on the angled bar, etc.
I hope the photos are good enough. The incuse die chip is a bit hard to see, but the edge of the incuse is pointed out with yellow arrows and the incuse gets deeper as it approaches the rim.
Is this just a strange coincidence?
Comment