EXTREMELY RARE 1946 INVERTED S MINT MARK ERROR
Collapse
X
-
EXTREMELY RARE 1946 INVERTED S MINT MARK ERROR
I JUST pulled this coin from a Bank Roll I got Yesterday from my bank. DAMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN. IF Im WRONG please tell me BUT I think this is a (VERY NICE FIND ) 1946 INVERTED S MINT MARK. Any know worth of a coin like this? The coin in in Good + Shape.Last edited by daveam1; 05-17-2015, 11:40 PM.Tags: None
-
-
I am not an expert by any means and maybe one of the experts will chime in to confirm or deny my analysis. I remembered two write-ups on Lincoln Cent S mint marks.
One here: http://www.lincolncentresource.com/S...rk_Styles.html
The other here:
Yours appears to be a variant of MMS-004 with some distortion cased by flattening of the S due to a hit sometime in its life and normal circulation wear. I don't know if MMS-004 is "rarer" than others or not. I could see how yours might resemble an inverted MMS-006 but the top serif on yours does not look like it matches the bottom serif on a normal MMS-006. I believe that what you have here is a normal MMS-004 that has seen its fair share of circulation. I hope this helps.Last edited by jmangham; 05-18-2015, 12:18 AM.CONECA member
-
-
Everything you need to know is here:
Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
-
Here is an inverted MMS-006.
BALL_SERIF_MMS-006-94x83.jpg
I dont see a match, close but no cigar. Seems I recall somebody writing about a mm from another denomination being written about in the mid 40's though..
I will do a little digging later this evening.Proud Member: CONECA, TEC, HVNS, NS, ANA
Comment
-
-
There is further reading on the CONECA website on the 1946-S Inverted S. Story is on this page:
3/4 of the way down the page.
Your coin is not an inverted S.Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
-
Overlay analysis shows that the mint mark is in the wrong position. I found the original 1946-S inverted mint mark in a purchase made at Mt. Dora, Florida in 2007. My latest find on this die was at a coin show where I cherry picked a MS-64, so they are still out there.
BJ NeffAttached FilesMember of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.
Comment
-
-
BJ,
I see you're still finding 'em!
KPKen Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
Comment