1975 Roosevelt dime multiple strike?

[N-6992]

Found this time last night at first glance I thought it might have been ran over in a parking lot or smashed by for an object, upon further inspection I noticed it was limited to one side and I also found the letters -One- on the rim. What would this be considered?

[Gcantrell7]

Road rash.

[N-6992]

I would have agreed if the word -ONE- wasn't present on the Rim sir.

[Zimmy]

The coin doesn't look like a genuine mint error. The rim area is obviously damaged. Could be a vise job that created the one on the rim area. The reverse looks mushy as if there was a soft surface against it when something was squeezed into the obverse of your coin.

[N-6992]

I definitely agree that's what it appears as. But the way that the fields are laid even is what I even posted for.
If they were putting it in a vise wouldn't the letters be backwards ? Unless they are some kind of pro at mimicking backwards letters. I mean it's clear that they owe in the end are prominent and you can see the E stretch onto the face of the coin now somebody's doing that with advice that's pretty badass.

[N-6992]

The letter's -ON- with a stretched E on the face - are in collar. Or so I see it. When I submit a coin for viewing, at that point I have used my best judgement and eliminated the common variable's. I do Not disagree, however when I end up here I'm extremely eager for a exact explanation of cause but even I know such demand is not easily found without thorough examination. All I need is an explanation of how the -one- is struck in collar with a stretched -E- on the face outside the mint. And the reason that I asked that question is a lot of people spend a lot of money COIN's and errors. If people go to these lengths and extremes to fake a coin , there is going to be experts that know exactly how the process takes place. Right? We're talking about couple hundred thousand dollars in some coins alone . Large #'s brings in extreme experts that have knowledge of the process. Or so they should .