Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1945 - S LWC with weak S

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1945 - S LWC with weak S

    What we have here is a 1945-S with a weak MM. I can't tell if it's caused from grease or from a weak punch on the die. Thoughts. Obverse.jpg Reverse.jpg Weak S.jpg

  • #2
    Greetings, not seeing a weak impression from the mint mark punch given how high the cross bar is compared to the end bars, but could have been a bit of a tilted mint mark punch, what bothers me is Lincolns lower bust seem to be weak given the clarity of the images is hard to tell. If that area is weak as well I`d say grease played a role, now the other point is the 4 looks a bit damaged and this could be the result of some PMD circ wear on a tilted punched mint mark.
    Lets see what ME or others may think.

    Comment


    • #3
      200 Faint 1 Lincoln Cent.jpg I think it is a good question. When I think of the Lincoln Cent 1922 D and the 1922 (No D) they also list the 1922 weak Dand it brings a premium. Yet when I took a couple coins to a dealer with very weak mint marks he considered them as just regular cents.
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #4
        In my opinion, there were a few years in the 40s where several of the working dies were probably used way too long. They look very late die stage. I have seen rolls and rolls of this issue. I prefer a nice strong mint mark. That way one has a decent chance at identifying If it is or is not an RPM. IF I have time later, I will pull some from the BU rolls and compare.
        Gary Kozera
        Website: https://MintErrors.org

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by V.B._Rick View Post
          200 Faint 1 Lincoln Cent.jpg I think it is a good question. When I think of the Lincoln Cent 1922 D and the 1922 (No D) they also list the 1922 weak Dand it brings a premium. Yet when I took a couple coins to a dealer with very weak mint marks he considered them as just regular cents.


          it's important to know the facts behind the 1922 no D and any other year. In 1922, they only struck coins in Denver, so this would have made it a unique situation, where it would appear to come from Philadelphia.

          With any other year, this is not the case. Plus, the certified 22s typically you cannot see a D.

          On any other year but the 22, A weak mint mark can simply mean it was clogged with debris, a worn die or literally several other reasons it happens. In my opinion, this coin is simply a non error, a worn out, over used working die.
          Last edited by MintErrors; 07-22-2023, 10:00 PM.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment


          • #6
            When I tried to click onto these links I get a 401 Error Page Not Found

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by V.B._Rick View Post
              When I tried to click onto these links I get a 401 Error Page Not Found


              this website (auto-shortens) truncates the url, that was the issue.
              I redid the links a few days ago. Thanks.
              Gary Kozera
              Website: https://MintErrors.org

              Comment

              Working...
              X