Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1979-D 1C RPM-001

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Sasso
    • Feb 2023
    • 190

    1979-D 1C RPM-001

    Hey everyone, just found this 1979-D Lincoln Cent RPM-001. I believe it may be an EDS/Stage-A example because I have zero of the the die markers listed on the various major error/variety/coin sites. None seem to have EDS examples either. I've noticed it mentions this being a slightly scarcer error variety and I'm curious if there are any known EDS examples and would that be an even scarcer example to find?
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 5 photos.
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3554

    #2
    Humm Its difficult due to the lighting to be absolutely sure. I suggest making absolutely sure the mint mark placement matches up with from the example on http://varietyvista.com.

    I think you are correct, the mint mark placement looks very close to where it should be. You just have to be very careful with the 1979-D's.

    The reason I say that is there was a "broken punch" that was used extensively in 1979. The article is here:


    Back in the day when CONECA tracked URS, the rarity of the variety, it did not have it broken down to actual eds/mds/lds. There is just no way to know and not every attributer at the third party grading service is putting that info on the labels or tracking the die stage.

    Die stages are tough to assess, unless you find an example at the same time the attributor found one. Lincoln cent dies strike up to 1 million coins with each working die, if it makes it that long. What I am trying to say is your coin may be at any stage. Most common markers like die scratches can wear away pretty or simply be erased by more maintenance later in that die stage. And the reverse dies could have been replaced at any time, which eliminates any markers/PUPS.

    Later die stages have a loose, sloppy appearance to the devices and if the coin was circulated, it adds to the complexity of being able to accurately assess the proper die stage.
    Last edited by MintErrors; 08-31-2023, 01:24 AM.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment

    • Paul Sasso
      • Feb 2023
      • 190

      #3
      Thank you very much for the information and I believe you are correct. This is not an RPM or at least the 001. I believe it is a very common broken mint mark punch. Thanks again for the Information!

      Comment

      Working...
      X