Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

How were the more subtle off metal errors verified before XRFs and digital scales?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TR137
    • Sep 2022
    • 23

    How were the more subtle off metal errors verified before XRFs and digital scales?

    I'm familiar with XRF and specific gravity testing, and ping testing, but was wondering what the error coin market was like decades ago before TPGs. Was a coin sounding off when pinged enough to make it a valuable mint error? Was there even a market for such oddities? How did they establish the exact metallurgic content non-destructively, or was it practice to file off some of the edge and do chemical tests on the filings? Was there some clever way to do specific gravity testing without a 0.001g digital scale?

  • Zimmy
    CONECA Treasurer/PA Rep
    • Aug 2007
    • 326

    #2
    I started collecting errors over 40 years ago. The main variables I used to determine wrong planchets/off metals were weight, color, thickness and diameter. I also used tables to determine wrong stock errors. I don't remember much about orphan off metals/wrong planchets. Filing edges was a practice that occurred years before I got involved. My guess was prior to the 70's.
    James Zimmerman
    Coneca N-911
    CONECA PA State Rep/Treasurer

    Comment

    • TR137
      • Sep 2022
      • 23

      #3
      Originally posted by Zimmy View Post
      I started collecting errors over 40 years ago. The main variables I used to determine wrong planchets/off metals were weight, color, thickness and diameter. I also used tables to determine wrong stock errors. I don't remember much about orphan off metals/wrong planchets. Filing edges was a practice that occurred years before I got involved. My guess was prior to the 70's.
      I'm not about to start filing edges, don't worry. Were you measuring thickness on the rim, the center, or field to field?

      Comment

      Working...
      X