Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1961 GW proof

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eyesore
    eyesore
    • May 2008
    • 22

    1961 GW proof

    A combination of DDO and mechanical?

    Coin was in a roll, and had a tough ride at some point...lots of scratches (groan)
    Attached Files
  • diamond
    • Jul 2007
    • 2040

    #2
    The G looks like it's suffering from die deterioration doubling. The faint doubling around the B looks like a consquence of die movement between strikes. Proof coins are struck more than once.
    Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.

    Comment

    • eyesore
      eyesore
      • May 2008
      • 22

      #3
      These odd points in the corners are a feature I've never encountered on silver GW's.......Thanks for the info Mike
      Attached Files
      Last edited by eyesore; 11-06-2009, 10:11 AM.

      Comment

      • coinartist

        #4
        I totally agree with mike yes it looks like Die deterioration doubling, sorry eyesore . I do see possible notching on the G through , could be a doubled die plus Die deterioration doubling also both can coesist on a coin .Brad Coinart
        Last edited by Guest; 11-06-2009, 11:22 AM.

        Comment

        • jello
          • Feb 2009
          • 126

          #5
          Proof Doubled Die's are hard to confirm. I know for sure in hand you can see more than a photo will show. but you can send off to get attributed or graded.
          I agree with Mike
          No one right 100% of timesI maybe wrong and will I say, sorry I was wrong

          Comment

          • eyesore
            eyesore
            • May 2008
            • 22

            #6
            Don't feel too bad

            Hit an auction in the middle of a blizzard last year, and got a bunch of rolls at melt..I'd set the 61 GW off to the side meaning to get back to it, and just plain forgot too.

            One reason for the distraction was that there were 2 of these in the mix of Roos. There were also a half dozen gem Type B GW's
            Attached Files

            Comment

            • jello
              • Feb 2009
              • 126

              #7
              Eyesore if I had in hand I could tell better what it is

              I no grader but photo's of the motto & date look like a winner.
              No one right 100% of timesI maybe wrong and will I say, sorry I was wrong

              Comment

              • rockdude
                COIN COLLECTOR
                • Sep 2008
                • 233

                #8
                Great finds.
                Most fools think they are only ignorant.
                -- Benjamin Franklin

                CONECA Member
                N-4556

                Comment

                • eyesore
                  eyesore
                  • May 2008
                  • 22

                  #9
                  The 1960 Roos is the real deal.

                  Comment

                  • jello
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 126

                    #10
                    It looks like to me but a TPG may say it is not.
                    No one right 100% of timesI maybe wrong and will I say, sorry I was wrong

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X