WIN_20210226_13_25_51_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_27_29_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_26_08_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_26_29_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_28_16_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_28_43_Pro.jpg
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1998 D Possible unlisted variety.
Collapse
X
-
1998 D Possible unlisted variety.
Similar to 1998D WWDR-009 but appears to extend down further - from the knees to a bit past the foot.
WIN_20210226_13_25_51_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_27_29_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_26_08_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_26_29_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_28_16_Pro.jpg WIN_20210226_13_28_43_Pro.jpg
Tags: None
-
Its a minor DDR, but I am confidant we won't list one this minor. I am going to want to see a much larger portion of the column, more than one column doubled or some part of the statue in addition to the column.Jason Cuvelier
CONECA
Lead attributer
-
Originally posted by jcuve View PostIts a minor DDR, but I am confidant we won't list one this minor. I am going to want to see a much larger portion of the column, more than one column doubled or some part of the statue in addition to the column.
Comment
-
Wexler lists things that are far more minor then much of what Dr. Wiles had listed. I am probably more inclined to fall somewhere in-between.
My single biggest concern with these smaller doubled column Lincolns is that there are so many. It would be one thing if there were just a few, but on any given year starting in the '90s they are so frequent it can be hard not finding one. This means if one wanted to catalog them all, it would require an extra amount of work with die markers to differentiate one from another. For those reasons I would like to keep it at something more substantial with these particular DDRs.Jason Cuvelier
CONECA
Lead attributer
Comment
Comment