New find 1972D Washington Quarter transitional reverse design
Collapse
X
-
A die clash is a form of an error, I suppose, since dies were not meant to clash.. But, they happen at a pretty regular basis. It is nothing new unless the clash is super dramatic. There are a few people who track known die clashes, but I don`t follow that sort of issue.
I will take a closer look at your photos.Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
-
-
20220101_164428.jpg Here's the Obverse its very busy as you will see. Extra thickness,die cracks,die gouges,die clash not related to previous years i believe the die markers can trace back to 1968s,65 and 64D.
Comment
-
-
i believe the die markers can trace back to 1968s,65 and 64D.Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
Comment
-
-
You are still misunderstanding the minting and striking process. A die crack on a 1964 can look similar to a die crack on a 1999 coin, but that does not mean they are the same die. Please take some time to study the many references for how a die is made. It will help immensely...I promise. As far as transitional reverse dies, you have the coin in hand so are better able to make that determination. You can find photos of all the reverse dies on the Internet if you do a search for them. In order to be a particular reverse die, ALL of the differences must be visible...not some of them. Some changes are subtle...others not so much. Do not expect to see a reverse from one year on a coin dated 10-20 years later. It just can't happen at the Mint.Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
Comment
-
-
So i had to clean up this 1972D Washington Quarter. Just had a vibe about it gut feeling that it was something special! I'm thinking it's a RVD-007 Type M or G///. Just have a look at the reverse! Wow not sure what class doubled die any options? Obverse doubled not as dramatic though and a die clash to boot. 20220105_224352.jpg
Comment
-
Comment