Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1937 D buffalo RPM19?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1937 D buffalo RPM19?

    I'm trying to match this 1937 D buffalo nickel to rpm19 on the Wexler site. What do you think?
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

  • #2
    Bob/Jason. I have uploaded RPM19 from the Wexler site for your convenience. Your thoughts on a match?
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

    Comment


    • #3
      It does not appear to be WRPM-019. The mint mark position seems incorrect, and the southwest portion of yours does not match Wexler's.
      Bob Piazza
      Lincoln Cent Attributer

      Comment


      • #4
        Bob. I pasted the coin and the RPM side by side in this attachment with arrows comparing what I see in the SW area. Can you show me the area you are focusing on to further my education? My coin is uncirculated and is shinier than the Wexler example. Thanks for your patience with me.
        You do not have permission to view this gallery.
        This gallery has 1 photos.

        Comment


        • #5
          In my opinion, Bob is right. You coin mintmark is not in the right position. John W's example has the mint mark slightly higher and to the left. Look at the tip of the "D" on John's example. It looks as if it almost touches the bottom of the "L". The magnification for both coins are not the same, but I think it's close enough to make an educated guess. John's example also shows the "D" sunk in more, almost look like the die was dented when the mint mark was applied onto the die.

          Look closely at John's example, at K1, K2 (clock position). There is an extra curve that is separate from the stronger mintmark. It actually starts at the top "D" tip of the serif and travels clockwise just beyond the stronger "D"...

          it is best to try to get the exact same angle photos and as close to the same size. Maybe then an overlay could be made to see if they match up, but I too think it is slightly off.

          I would check variety vista to see if they used multiple punch types for the year. They look a tad bit different, but it could simply be due to wear.
          Last edited by MintErrors; 02-09-2022, 08:35 PM.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment


          • #6
            Definitely not a match. Im not even sure your coin is an RPM. It looks like abrasion

            Comment


            • #7
              Thank you gentlemen. I understand what you are focusing on now.

              Comment

              Working...
              X