Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1964-D RPM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3554

    1964-D RPM

    Most of the RPM's and Doubled dies are pretty easy for me to attribute. Along come a few in this massive RPM and DDO collection I bought about 5 years ago that I am not too sure of. Like this 1964-D RPM below.

    On Coppercoins, as best I can tell by the photos, is that the best potential match MIGHT be #23. But the coin in my hand, the primary "D" seems more tilted than #23.

    https://coppercoins.com/lincoln/dies...&die_state=mds

    What do you think?

    Looking at the RPM below, the overall look, seems to have this RPM slightly tilted to the right. Most of the ones on Coppercoins seem to be tilted to the left

    Other RPM's that are close - but no cigar are:
    17, 20, 21 and 25.

    I have five of these RPM's in hand. I looked over each of these coins to see if any of the die markers existed that were on Copperoins, and none of them are. I am a little concerned that this RPM is not #23, as the look of the split upper serif appears to be different.

    OK, now that the best info I can offer is out there, have a look at what I see under the 'scope:

    1964-D unknown RPM-x2.jpg

    1964-D unknown RPM-x4.jpg

    1964-D unknown RPM-x8.jpg

    Since I have 5 of these, I was able to find some common markers on all five of the coins. There were others, but these seem to be the more pronounced ones:

    1964-D unknown RPM-scratches-BER-x4.jpg

    1964-D unknown RPM-scratches-date-x4b.jpg

    Have a look, help and ask any questions about this coin. I don't have a definite attribution for this coin - yet.

    1964-D unknown RPM Obv.jpg

    1964-D unknown RPM Rev.jpg
    Attached Files
    Last edited by MintErrors; 04-01-2022, 09:51 AM.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org
  • Kloccwork419
    Banned
    • Dec 2020
    • 488

    #2
    It doesnt match to me. I dont think its listed on CC at all. Your lower serif has a large split in it compared to similar ones.

    Comment

    • MintErrors
      Minterrors.org
      • Jun 2015
      • 3554

      #3
      Originally posted by Kloccwork419 View Post
      It doesnt match to me. I dont think its listed on CC at all. Your lower serif has a large split in it compared to similar ones.
      Geesh, I am piling up these unknowns pretty quickly. That's the fourth in several months.
      Thanks for the confirmation.
      Gary Kozera
      Website: https://MintErrors.org

      Comment

      • eaxtellcoin
        RPM Dealer Specialist
        • Feb 2008
        • 798

        #4
        This one is not bad Gary. at first I thought it was Wexler #18 with the DDO above the B of Liberty but I noticed another marker photo that doesn't show the DDO. Strike one, this one is Not Wexler 018,019,027,039,041,051,052,053,054,057,058,059. I will say this, I have an un attributed roll of 1964-D's I took a quick glance. I see three dies at least with positioning of the primary mintmark close to this die. I would bet you will need to sacrifice a coin to get it listed just so the attributer has a copy to verify against new die states that come in. Eric
        Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 04-04-2022, 11:04 PM.

        Comment

        • MintErrors
          Minterrors.org
          • Jun 2015
          • 3554

          #5
          Originally posted by eaxtellcoin View Post
          This one is not bad Gary. at first I thought it was Wexler #18 with the DDO above the B of Liberty but I noticed another marker photo that doesn't show the DDO. Strike one, this one is Not Wexler 018,019,027,039,041,051,052,053,054,057,058,059. I will say this, I have an un attributed roll of 1964-D's I took a quick glance. I see three dies at least with positioning of the primary mintmark close to this die. I would bet you will need to sacrifice a coin to get it listed just so the attributer has a copy to verify against new die states that come in. Eric
          Well, I have three Lincolns now like this, a 1945-S, This 1964-D and the 1961-D. Good news is that I will give Jason C. and his team one each if they desire one for the library. I have a ton more to go through, and I have a feeling, I will have a few more.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment

          Working...
          X