User Profile
Collapse
-
lost Coneca forum again. Must be my slow internet but it seems everything else works.
Anyway: Pick Layers from drop down menu
Click the very...Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 05-05-2025, 10:18 PM.
-
-
Evening Ron,
I think you also have this one correct as RPM012. It cannot be RPM032 or 037 besides the ones listed above. The primary mintmark position...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Evening Mike,
PCGS uses the acronym from the Cherrypickers guide - Fivaz - Stanton. - you can find those at shows, and on line. There up to Volume...Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 05-05-2025, 08:48 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Evening Ron,
I tried to post to the thread last night. Forum froze again before I could post. So try #2 and I will copy before I post reply
...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning Shleppodella1,
Pictures are getting better! I see some lint in the lower curve. The slightly raised part above the lower serif is normal...
Leave a comment:
-
-
"Un verdadero dado doble debe tener las impresiones a la misma altura.?"
"A true double die must have the impressions at the same...
Leave a comment:
-
-
First. I believe this is damage from a circulated coin. I edited the best photo I could to prove the point. So a Doubled Die is when a master die strikes...Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 05-02-2025, 09:42 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning Ariel,
The photo's are good and clear, thank you.
I just don't see any seperation on this reverse.
Tip: an arrow will help...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning, My oppinion Gary hit the nail on the head.
I would try to use a toothpick and see if the junk in the upper left corner can be removed...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning Folks,
From what I see, the Date appears to be the normal size. No seperation, Cookie cutter lines like Gary mentioned. This my oppinion...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Ok those are great but the pixels of the photo's are to small when I blow them up. I think it maybe listable. You just need to decide if you want to send...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Remember that we are discussing a working die. I have not found anywhere proof that the San Francisco Mint used a proof Mintmark Punch - I spent only...
Leave a comment:
-
-
""This coin was already published, but the photos were very poor, and I didn't have it in my possession. On the reverse, it appears that the...
Leave a comment:
-
-
This one was posted in the wrong place. Moving the post to the die variety forum.
Pictures need to be added to all questions. Best bet post whole...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Sorry those to me, my oppinion don't help. A close up like these, with the light facing towards the top serif and curve of the upper part of the mintmark...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Hello Signofthedimes,
The very last photo, bottom right is interesting. Can you take a whole date / mintmark photo showing that upper loop? Looks...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Removed by poster. Posted in wrong forum.You do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 1 photos.Last edited by CentR; 04-24-2025, 05:55 PM.
-
-
Hello Shleppodella1,
I tried to respond to this post last night with heavy rain in our area. I got a error 1 when I tried to respond so the issues...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning Gary,
BTW: Very nice clear photo's, very easy to see.
To me my oppinion this looks like MD - Machine damage doubling....
Leave a comment:
-
-
Morning Gary,
I looked at your post on the 1946-P dime. My oppinion it's just MD, I tried to find a nice well struck EDS to show you what to look...Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 04-13-2025, 11:48 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
No activity results to display
Show More
Leave a comment: