Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Double die

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mobilprojohnny
    • Nov 2022
    • 41

    Double die

    Hi is this a double die?
    Attached Files
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3678

    #2
    No.
    No year to research, no full coin obverse and reverse.



    Three helpful posts:
    How to take better photos with a Cellphone:
    https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...th-a-cellphone

    RPM or DDO question? Help us help YOU:
    https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...lp-us-help-you

    What Forum to post your coin questions:
    https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...t-forum-to-use

    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment

    • Ray Parkhurst
      • Aug 2007
      • 192

      #3
      Originally posted by MintErrors View Post
      No.
      No year to research, no full coin obverse and reverse.
      Are you saying that you would not be able to tell if this was potentially a doubled die unless you knew what year it was minted, and had images of both the full obverse and reverse?

      Comment

      • PNWMAKES
        • Dec 2021
        • 529

        #4
        Seeing full obverse and reverse makes it a lot easier to make a determination.

        Comment

        • mustbebob
          Moderator
          • Aug 2007
          • 3050

          #5
          Are you saying that you would not be able to tell if this was potentially a doubled die unless you knew what year it was minted, and had images of both the full obverse and reverse?
          I know what you are trying to get at Ray, but this is a little more than just that. In the forum world, how would we track this coin and this post? What would we search for if we had to come back to it later? It would also be helpful to have the other info to help attribute this coin. If this were a doubled die, we could tell the member which one it was and direct them to where they may be able to see it. Can't do that without a date and the ability to spot markers.
          Bob Piazza
          Lincoln Cent Attributer

          Comment

          • MintErrors
            Minterrors.org
            • Jun 2015
            • 3678

            #6
            Originally posted by Ray Parkhurst View Post

            Are you saying that you would not be able to tell if this was potentially a doubled die unless you knew what year it was minted, and had images of both the full obverse and reverse?

            In my opinion, it is extremely helpful, as Bob has noted to have more than a photo of one section of a coin. With additional photos, and the date, one can then try to see if variety vista or other site has any documented doubled dies. When it comes to posts like this, if there is no good information, then I give the same short answer we got from the original poster. People constantly add photos and ask the exact same question a lot.

            It's a two way street here. The original poster should supply some amplifying info. I don't want this to become a food fight, but in the end the original poster should help us, help them. They learn from it, and a select few go on to attribute coins by themselves.
            Last edited by MintErrors; 12-05-2022, 02:32 AM.



            Three helpful posts:
            How to take better photos with a Cellphone:
            https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...th-a-cellphone

            RPM or DDO question? Help us help YOU:
            https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...lp-us-help-you

            What Forum to post your coin questions:
            https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...t-forum-to-use

            Gary Kozera
            Website: https://MintErrors.org

            Comment

            • Ray Parkhurst
              • Aug 2007
              • 192

              #7
              I agree that IF the coin appears to be a doubled die, then it makes sense for the owner to post more info about it so that a determination can be made if it might be worth looking further into. Presumably the owner would have taken a photo showing an area that exhibits doubling, and if folks agree that doubling is evident, then more info would be requested. If not, then a simple "this does not show any evidence of doubling" or whatever would be appropriate, and reasonable folks could move on. The problem I have is that MintErrors just said "no", and gave the justification that more extensive research info was not shared. That response was inappropriate in my opinion. That said, I don't see any evidence of doubling in the image provided, so the "no" answer may be correct, but is it really appropriate to ask for the owner to take more pictures and provide more information about a coin when it has already been determined that the coin is not a doubled die? Is the idea just to give busy work to the owner?

              I see many kneejerk responses on the various forums, and IMO they are an embarrasment to the hobby. I do realize that there are a lot of folks who have unreasonable expectations, and I personally don't have the fortitude to put up with some of the games that seem to be played. I expect the kneejerk responses are a reaction by those who may be jaded by these folks, and it is understandable, but those responses don't help the hobby. We need to foster the collecting spirit, not squash it.

              Comment

              • mustbebob
                Moderator
                • Aug 2007
                • 3050

                #8
                Thanks for your opinion Ray. I prefer to not get into it here in the public form as to why I want the info. I refer you to the CONECA Forum Rules, item 12.
                Bob Piazza
                Lincoln Cent Attributer

                Comment

                • Ray Parkhurst
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 192

                  #9
                  I looked all around but could not find the Forum Rules. I found some Forum Protocols, but it has a couple item 12's and neither seems appropriate for the discussion. Can you give a link to the Forum Rules?

                  Comment

                  • mustbebob
                    Moderator
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 3050

                    #10
                    I don't want to make mountains out of mole hills Ray. I just want to keep control of my forum.

                    Bob Piazza
                    Lincoln Cent Attributer

                    Comment

                    • Mobilprojohnny
                      • Nov 2022
                      • 41

                      #11
                      Hi guys thank you. That picture was a screen shot of a newer quarter from pcgs website. I just like to see if that how a double look like since the new coin is made with a single sqeeze. I don't remember which quarter i was looking at.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X