Double die
Collapse
X
-
No.
No year to research, no full coin obverse and reverse.
Three helpful posts:
How to take better photos with a Cellphone:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...th-a-cellphone
RPM or DDO question? Help us help YOU:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...lp-us-help-you
What Forum to post your coin questions:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...t-forum-to-use
Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
-
-
Are you saying that you would not be able to tell if this was potentially a doubled die unless you knew what year it was minted, and had images of both the full obverse and reverse?Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ray Parkhurst View Post
Are you saying that you would not be able to tell if this was potentially a doubled die unless you knew what year it was minted, and had images of both the full obverse and reverse?
In my opinion, it is extremely helpful, as Bob has noted to have more than a photo of one section of a coin. With additional photos, and the date, one can then try to see if variety vista or other site has any documented doubled dies. When it comes to posts like this, if there is no good information, then I give the same short answer we got from the original poster. People constantly add photos and ask the exact same question a lot.
It's a two way street here. The original poster should supply some amplifying info. I don't want this to become a food fight, but in the end the original poster should help us, help them. They learn from it, and a select few go on to attribute coins by themselves.Last edited by MintErrors; 12-05-2022, 02:32 AM.
Three helpful posts:
How to take better photos with a Cellphone:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...th-a-cellphone
RPM or DDO question? Help us help YOU:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...lp-us-help-you
What Forum to post your coin questions:
https://board.conecaonline.org/forum...t-forum-to-use
Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
-
-
I agree that IF the coin appears to be a doubled die, then it makes sense for the owner to post more info about it so that a determination can be made if it might be worth looking further into. Presumably the owner would have taken a photo showing an area that exhibits doubling, and if folks agree that doubling is evident, then more info would be requested. If not, then a simple "this does not show any evidence of doubling" or whatever would be appropriate, and reasonable folks could move on. The problem I have is that MintErrors just said "no", and gave the justification that more extensive research info was not shared. That response was inappropriate in my opinion. That said, I don't see any evidence of doubling in the image provided, so the "no" answer may be correct, but is it really appropriate to ask for the owner to take more pictures and provide more information about a coin when it has already been determined that the coin is not a doubled die? Is the idea just to give busy work to the owner?
I see many kneejerk responses on the various forums, and IMO they are an embarrasment to the hobby. I do realize that there are a lot of folks who have unreasonable expectations, and I personally don't have the fortitude to put up with some of the games that seem to be played. I expect the kneejerk responses are a reaction by those who may be jaded by these folks, and it is understandable, but those responses don't help the hobby. We need to foster the collecting spirit, not squash it.
Comment
-
-
I don't want to make mountains out of mole hills Ray. I just want to keep control of my forum.
Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
Comment
-
Comment