Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1964 D RPM FS-502?
Collapse
X
-
Where is the FS-502 number coming from? I do not see any FS numbers for a 1964D RPM on Variety Vista. If you are going to use the info as you have it, you can not expect the folks on the forum to search through other web sites to find somethi8ng to compare it to. You could post a link to the page you got this info from to help anyone who wants to help.Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
-
Sorry The FS-502 is from the PCGS Website.( 1964-D 25C RPM FS-502 (Regular Strike) Washington Quarter - PCGS CoinFacts) I had thought that every seasoned collector knew what a Fivaz-Stanton number was.Last edited by ChiefDowis; 12-15-2022, 11:46 AM.
Comment
-
Everybody here is not a seasoned collector. We are hoping to help them become one some day. It seems as though only the PCGS website has that FS number. I do not see it on VV or Wexler's site. Therefore, it has no RPM number assigned to it if it is an RPM. No one I know repeats the PCGS number as an RPM number.
I make the point again...do you expect folks from here to go to the PCGS website and then switch between each site to compare? To make it easier on you to get some responses, maybe you should reference or link to the site you want them to look at?Bob Piazza
Lincoln Cent Attributer
Comment
-
Originally posted by mustbebob View PostWhere is the FS-502 number coming from? I do not see any FS numbers for a 1964D RPM on Variety Vista. If you are going to use the info as you have it, you can not expect the folks on the forum to search through other web sites to find somethi8ng to compare it to. You could post a link to the page you got this info from to help anyone who wants to help.
The cherrypickers' Guide states for this variety that it is not listed by CONECA, and the photographs provided by the OP do not show the second Mintmark punch.
Comment
-
1964D 25-FS-502.jpg
Photo from NGC's web page, Washington Quarters (1932-1998) | VarietyPlus® | NGC (ngccoin.com)
NOTE: NGC has the comments:
Diagnostics
The mintmark is repunched in its correct position, the first impression having been extremely northeast of it and nearly touching the wreath.
Comments
In the example illustrated, there is unrelated strike doubling visible at the right side of the correctly placed mintmark.
Comment
-
Variety Vista doesn't have any FS numbers for that year. My Cherry pickers guides are loose leaf papers awaiting to be scanned. I don't dare move the and disturb fate. So far the pile is stable.
I cannot zoom in close enough for a good look. The die stage might be different as there appears to be a few scratches just north of the mint mark..
The mintmark appears to be in a different position, therefore not the same variety, in my opinion.
Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
Comment