1992-D 1C WDDO-001? I think.

[279773]

Have a 92 D Lincoln Memorial Cent here. It has the look of a wddo 001 in the 1992 d catagory i believe. Im tired now. Its been a rough week here. Im out of practice with my photos, but i do hope these suffice.

[279773]

I took the liberty of posting more pic, sorry if too many. I just thought i should do this coin justice. Maybe it is what i think. Maybe not. I am still just a grass hopper in a field of owls.

[occnumis2021]

you think it is the top one?

https://www.doubleddie.com/467734.html

[279773]

Yes indeed

[Petespockets55]

you think it is the top one?

https://www.doubleddie.com/467734.html

Thanks for the link. It always speeds things up when attributing.

I can't tell from these images. The 2 doesn't look right at the upper curve. And the right side of the "Y" (RTY) looks to be slightly larger on DD.com images than this coin.

[occnumis2021]

Thanks for the link. It always speeds things up when attributing.

I can't tell from these images. The 2 doesn't look right at the upper curve. And the right side of the "Y" (RTY) looks to be slightly larger on DD.com images than this coin.

for my part, i am not certain. the "thickness" seems kinda obvious on dd.com but i figure there is a reason it isn't listed on v v. perhaps seeing one in-hand it more obvious? die markers (if any/many exist would really help on dd.com)

most of us could/should include links as a lot of the time we visit the sites anyway but i like for newer/less experienced members to do some leg work . hehe

i've visited attirubtion sites in their various forms many thousands of times over the years as i'm sure the experienced numismatists here also have.

[279773]

Ok, right now i have no computer or office or girl friday. Im new to the hobby. I am now in moms garage shooting this coin 100 more times in various lighting and distances with a phone from walmart. If i had a laptop with a good proccessor i would be 100 percent more efficient. I have 8 more photos to present . These will be the last ones. I tried to capture those aspects of the coin which were questioned in the comments. I ve been at it for 2 hours. The coin does not look MAD. The rims look aligned correctly, as so often happens a coin with misaligned die looks doubled, but is usually only the result of the bad alignment. So. Well. Here they are my final 8 pics. I will offer this coin as error, you know where, as i can pick it apart from others, on a table with my naked eye, and mu eyes are bad. Thankyou for all the feedback and the polite responses. 279773.

[279773]

I am sad to say that the penny was accidently spent today.

[Petespockets55]

[QUOTE=occnumis2021;n87774]

for my part, i am not certain... most of us could/should include links as a lot of the time we visit the sites anyway .../QUOTE]
I'm feeling the same way about this being the variety.

I try to include links to the attribution sites and sometimes add the links when they aren't included. It helps everyone follow along and the more eyes the better.

... I will offer this coin as error, ... as i can pick it apart from others, on a table with my naked eye, and mu eyes are bad. Thankyou for all the feedback and the polite responses. 279773.

Having the coin in hand makes all the difference sometimes. I admire all the time you put into trying to get better images. I think most of us have issues with really clear images. That being said, I still can't make a determination on whether it is the DDO variety or not.

Keep searching. They will show up it you keep at it.


ps. FWIW- Most people refer to these as varieties, not errors.

[279773]

My 92 d suspect is back, ! I was cleaning up odds and ends around my work area and Presto, its back, im immediatly going to put in flip , and relegate it to my pouch of offered coins. Which are offered somewhere.