1969 S RPM?
Collapse
X
-
have you looked at varietyvista/doubleddie/lincolncentresource etc? some of the rpms in these years are kinda tough to pin down. (not saying your coin is an rpm)coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com
-
-
Originally posted by Bonnie View PostThe other place I posted this was inconclusive. To me it looks like a RPM but I couldn't find a match for it. I do not have a real good coin magnifier so these were the best images I could get. 1969 S
The placement of the mintmark on the coin is vital when trying to attribute if it is a RPM.
Each working die that had been made had the mint mark hammered by hand into the die.
The placement varied a little, and anywhere south of the date on the field (flat part of the coin) was ok. Those slight changes in location can help attribute a coin.
So, a direct on shot of the date helps out immensely.
Three places to look over are
Die varieties such as doubled dies, Repunched mint marks (RPMs), Over Mint Marks (OMMs), Repunched Dates, Overdates, coin design varieties, as well as regular coins and error coins.
I will assist as best I can in a few hours..Some serious thunder boomers are headed here.Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
-
-
In my opinion, the last photo reveals a lot of worthless doubling on the date of this 1969-S. As best I can tell from the photos, so does the mintmark have worthless doubling. It's lower and shelf like, and mimics the same direction of the date, southeast to northwest. I cannot make out the item that is directly above the southern ball serif, it gets too fuzzy when I zoom in.
I did not see any matches on copper coins. My gut instinct says it is probably not an RPM.
1969-S didn't have a ton of RPMs. Although the 1959-D, 1960-D and 1961-D are fun to go through, and the BU rolls can be pretty cheap if found from a good source who does not cherry pick the rolls.Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MintErrors View PostIn my opinion, the last photo reveals a lot of worthless doubling on the date of this 1969-S. As best I can tell from the photos, so does the mintmark have worthless doubling. It's lower and shelf like, and mimics the same direction of the date, southeast to northwest. I cannot make out the item that is directly above the southern ball serif, it gets too fuzzy when I zoom in.
I did not see any matches on copper coins. My gut instinct says it is probably not an RPM.
1969-S didn't have a ton of RPMs. Although the 1959-D, 1960-D and 1961-D are fun to go through, and the BU rolls can be pretty cheap if found from a good source who does not cherry pick the rolls.
Doubling.jpg
MD_Push_DOubling_.jpg
I do also see what appears as Die Chips mingling with the "S"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bonnie View PostThe other place I posted this was inconclusive. To me it looks like a RPM but I couldn't find a match for it. I do not have a real good coin magnifier so these were the best images I could get. 1969 S
All you need is some books and a bottle cap.
Coin_Pictures_101.png
Comment
-
Comment