Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1962-D RPM-003 / Possible Clash on Obverse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1962-D RPM-003 / Possible Clash on Obverse

    Today I was looking at my 1962-D Washington Quarter, which I believe has the attributes of the RPM-003. Several die cracks can be found on both sides. What struck me as odd, is a gear shaped imprint on Washington’s cheek. I am curious if the imprint is a die clash or PMD.
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

  • #2
    In my opinion, although gallery photos may look appealing to some, they are a pain to try and zoom in and try to assess what is going on.

    We would need a nice straight on photo of the mint mark, centered in the photo. Back then they hammered the mintmark into the working dies, and each one has a slightly different location.

    The gear like marks might simply be reeding from another coin being dropped on it. The reeding could be from any coin, from a quarter to a dollar in size. The reeding is on the thinnest portion of the coin.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks, Gary. The file size limitations is what led me to the gallery view. I was able to reduce the size of the photos. Let me know if these work for you.PICT0008.jpg
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by JMACD013 View Post
        Thanks, Gary. The file size limitations is what led me to the gallery view. I was able to reduce the size of the photos. Let me know if these work for you.PICT0008.jpg
        Gary, what he means is, publish the coin complete and focused on the damage. You're with the big boys.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by JMACD013 View Post
          Thanks, Gary. The file size limitations is what led me to the gallery view. I was able to reduce the size of the photos. Let me know if these work for you.
          In my opinion, your photos are fine. I can't say that for the example photos on variety vista I cannot get the photo sizes to the right dimensions in order to produce a good overlay in order to see if it is a match. They would have to line up exactly, and these will not.

          If I look closely at the example listed on variety vista, the appearance on the southern part of the mintmark(s) is different. Maybe some one else can give it a try and see if this is a match. Gut feeling tells me this is not a match, but I could be wrong.

          I see machine doubling on the coin, so that is kinda swaying my opinion. The die cracks that variety vista shows, may not be there IF this coin is die stage A. IF it is older than Stage A, then I would expect to see at least a few of the die cracks in the coin in the locations where variety vista shows them.

          I personally do not get many emails from this website. I have shut off most notifications.It's usually time and luck-of-the draw whether I circle around to older posts. I disliked the number of inbound emails I was receiving from this website so now, its much better.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment

          Working...
          X