Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1955D

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1955D

    What classification would this coin get for the die chips and smeared UNUM and crack in forehead and the other things?
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 7 photos.

  • #2
    In my opinion, UNUM is die deterioration. The metal flow goes toward the rim.
    The others are common place for later stage working dies.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment


    • #3
      So die chips on the words and numbers and die cracks like that are not errors then? Or just not worth while one's?
      The way the UNUM flows upto the rim like that all level what is that then please because I have a few out of the same roll that have a normal looking rim then some that have that look flowing up to the rim? So the hub is distorting from repeated strikes and gets the LDS distinction(mushy, runny)?
      Last edited by Shleppodella1; 07-03-2024, 05:18 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Reason I ask is I see alot of slabbed errors as those go for a pretty penny (pun intended).

        Comment


        • #5
          In my opinion, slabbed major errors might go for a pretty penny, but those are specific categories and conditions. Off-centers, wrong planchets, mules, multi-struck, brockage, improper collar, mated pair, broad struck, bonded, die caps, double denomination, transitional and proof errors are some of the major errors prior to 2003.

          Return on investment is everything. Coins that go for outrageous prices can be listed on websites and no one buys them. It's easy to list high prices for the seller to hope they can ask the world and by some miracle, get one.

          Search completed auctions if on a popular auction house. If on the higher end auction houses, search past auctions, and note many hammer prices DO include a buyers fee, but don't normally include taxes and shipping.

          The fees associated with slabbing coins is pricey. If examination, authentication and slabbing is desired by someone a single coin can cost close to 100 bucks. If some one claims high values on the coin(s), the insurance values go up - so does the cost. Typically, third party grading services charge close to a minimum of 25 usd for return shipping on values less than somewhere near 1000 usd of value. It goes up from there. Same with grading fees. They increase significantly. They can go as high as one percent of the claimed value of the coin. I think that is somewhere near 10K of value. Check the current prices, from the TPG, as they change.
          Gary Kozera
          Website: https://MintErrors.org

          Comment


          • #6
            They may be classified as errors, but they are of way lesser value, in my opinion. Drama is everything in error coins. If some are only visible under magnification, it may thwart people, since they can't see it. Not everyone has a microscope, some collect "neat" things.

            Like I said above, that's die deterioration. In simple terms, if a die is worn, some of the metal of the coin may escape the letters. This metal movement is designed, so the metal can flow outwards and fill the collar, keeping the coin round. The collar and metal flow creates the reeding on coins that have it.

            One has to comprehend that coins are squashed between two dies with tons of pressure and its a battle of metal vs metal. Weird things happen.

            The only thing I personally find interesting is a very light die clash below Lincoln's chin. That probably the reason for the abraded die or commonly called die scratches, which are raised on the coin.

            I suggest to anyone interested in understanding error coins to find a copy of a book like;
            The error Encyclopedia by Arnold Margolis. Fred Weinberg Co authored a later edition. This explained how the mint makes coins. People can read, hopefully comprehend each stage of the minting process. Then, they can hopefully confirm or debunk the coin in hand. Sure some potential errors are head scratchers. Some are very minor. Some may be difficult to assess.

            Research is everything.
            Last edited by MintErrors; 07-03-2024, 11:34 AM.
            Gary Kozera
            Website: https://MintErrors.org

            Comment

            Working...
            X