Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1958 D 1c ODV-010 Over ODV-021

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #16
    it is not a D/S. it is not a tripled date.
    CONECA Attributer: John Miller

    Comment

    • #17
      Dear Mr. Miller, please reference the 1955 D/S CONECA: OMM-001 (FS-05-1955D-501) as they are near identical. I know it is a Jefferson, but where else are you going to go to find out what a D/S looks like? They have the most, don't you think?. I, personally, do not find it strange, or impossible, that there would be a D/S in the early Lincoln series, especially so close to when they quit making business strike Lincolns in SF. The good reverse dies were punched over with a D and sent off. Plus, I believe the serif on my coin looks better

      Comment

      • #18
        Originally posted by LoyVA2 View Post
        I, personally, do not find it strange, or impossible, that there would be a D/S in the early Lincoln series, especially so close to when they quit making business strike Lincolns in SF.
        Dies were made in Philadelphia each year. there were NO coins made in San Fran after 58.. until 65, 66, 67 with not MM and ^* with a S mint mark. you coin does not have a D over S. this has been pointed out many times. Not possible as the mint Did not have S mint mark punches at that time. you have had specialist and a attributer let you know our opinion is it is not a DDO... it is not a OMM,... it is not an Overdate. If you believe otherwise, then enjoy your coin, find a attributer that is well known to assist you in IDing this, or have it certified paying the extra variety search fees. Sorry, but I can not help anymore. Thank You, Enjoy the Forum.

        CONECA Attributer: John Miller

        Comment

        • #19
          Originally posted by onecent1909 View Post

          Dies were made in Philadelphia each year. there were NO coins made in San Fran after 58.. until 65, 66, 67 with not MM and ^* with a S mint mark. you coin does not have a D over S. this has been pointed out many times. Not possible as the mint Did not have S mint mark punches at that time. you have had specialist and a attributer let you know our opinion is it is not a DDO... it is not a OMM,... it is not an Overdate. If you believe otherwise, then enjoy your coin, find a attributer that is well known to assist you in IDing this, or have it certified paying the extra variety search fees. Sorry, but I can not help anymore. Thank You, Enjoy the Forum.
          Dear Mr. Miller. I thank you for all of your help. Please keep an open mind to the possibility that this coin has been hiding in plain site the whole time and that it has never been presented in such an early die state before. If it is not an over date, why does it look like an 8/7? And if it is not a triple date, why does the date look like it was struck at least 3 times? 1958over7D_NOTE_SM.png IMG_941_NOTES_SM.pngThank you.​

          Comment

          • #20
            It Doesn't look tripled struck, the 58/7 has been disproven. Im done.
            CONECA Attributer: John Miller

            Comment

            • #21
              ground off 1957copy2.pngThank you, Mr. Miller. But, I don't think that study included the Denver mint, or it would have said so in the type 7 description. Because here, in this picture, is an almost completely ground off secondary date, of 1957, north of the primary date. You can even see the grinder marks, west and north of the primary 1. Thank you.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...
              X