1983D tilted mintmark

[Shleppodella1]

Is this enough of a tilted to be an error?

[MintErrors]

In my opinion, no. Its pretty close to normal. The mint mark used to say the placement of the mint mark was to be in the field south of the date. I am paraphrasing. I will see if i can find smething dramatic that might be classed as an error. The only legit few that pops in to my head is an horizontal or inverted mintmark.

Even in the 1960s, there wasnt one that was severely tilted and they had boatloads of mint marks for that year.

There was a mint mark on this forum that appeared severely tilted less than a week ago. It was debunked, it was caused by split plating. It was a zinc cent.

https://board.conecaonline.org/forum/die-variety-forum/119011-1983-d-lincoln-1c-cw-d

[Shleppodella1]

Thanks Gary. I believe I remember Conan62 posting that one and I read it.