2025 Jefferson Nickel "RX" Obverse possible DDR?

[Chadpage154]

20251207_215628.jpg 20251207_213709.jpg 20251207_215707.jpg 20251207_213637.jpg 20251207_214418.jpg 20251207_213829.jpg 20251207_213838.jpg So I stumbled on the use 2025 Jefferson Nickel that has what looks to be a minting error. The "R" on the Obverse in "TRUST" looks like there was a line running through the right leg. It looks to me like they are one and the same. Kind of like the "RX" logo you aee at pharmacies. Also it seems that the "E" on the reverse looks like its possibly doubled. I know photos are hard to judge by, but I was hoping for some opinions. Thanks

These may be nothing but the idea of an "RX" Nickel for collecting does sound kind of cool. Thoughts?

[N8Brown]

Between my admittedly limited experience and the fact that the pictures of the reverse are a little blurry, I would be reluctant to weigh in on the DDR question, but if I were forced to give an opinion I would lean toward no.

The obverse is really interesting! In addition to the "R" in trust, I'm also curious about what's going on above the "U". Is that just light playing tricks in the pictures or is that also a mark of some fashion? I voted Mint Error, but again, I'm fairly new and still learning a lot about errors and varieties so I will be curious to see how others weigh in.

[eaxtellcoin]

No vote. To me this is struck through a fragment - Debris - on the die.

[Chadpage154]

Thank you for your insight. I appreciate it. Always learning something new. So this coin is a "one and done" thing you are saying? And are you saying that this did happen during the minting process? I am just trying to find tangible evidence of different errors, machine doubling, etc. So that i can physically see these anomalies. Its hard to study things only in pictures or on the internet. Nothing beats just studying it in person.

[eaxtellcoin]

Chad, touch that with a toothpick - see if it moves. if it moves then iit's something else then what I stated before. It could just be a lamination, yes very short but I'm just not sure what that is. Can you post a close OBV/REV photo also. That may help us.

[Chadpage154]

These are pictures of the Obverse

20251207_215349.jpg 20251207_215419.jpg 20251207_215505.jpg 20251207_215401.jpg 20251207_215455.jpg 20251207_215437.jpg

[Chadpage154]

These are the Reverse 20251207_215333.jpg 20251207_215118.jpg 20251207_215256.jpg 20251207_215308.jpg 20251207_215242.jpg 20251207_215225.jpg

[Chadpage154]

Then the Obverse and Reverse along with some pictures of the discrepancies. 20251207_215628.jpg 20251207_215707.jpg 20251207_214418.jpg 20251207_214349.jpg 20251207_213637.jpg 20251207_215832.jpg

[eaxtellcoin]

Morning Chad, Sorry haven't answered sooner.
I cannot tell, from the photo's if the coin has anything on the REV. What you show on "CENT" looks to be die fatigue.

As for your question on the Debris. I have a copy of a 1959-D Cent that I can show the debris may only be there for one strike or just a few. This coin was from a BU Roll. Notice the OBV markers for the die are the same? That means this coin was produced from the same die. How long the debris stayed on the die would be the question.

1959-D_With_Debris_REV.jpg 1959-D_With_Debris.jpg 1959-D_Without_Debris_REV.jpg 1959-D_Without_Debris.jpg

[eaxtellcoin]

Chad, I think Nathan answered the question for you. Thanks Nathan I admittedly didn't ""See"" the depression over the "U" of TRUST. So if you go to error-ref.com and look up lamination. What appears above the "U" of Trust is the lamination after it has fallen of the planchet/coin. What you see stuck to the "R" in Trust" is the lamination fragment itself. Same size/shape - My coin above does not have this so they are two different types of errors. Nice find. I can say I've not found one!
Sorry for the inconveniance.
Eric