Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

no initials apparent

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • no initials apparent

    I have been concentrating on 1988 Lincoln with 1989 initials. Today I found a 1988-D with no initials (MS-60). Can someone let me know if there is an FSO number for this omission similar to the Missing Designers Initials on the 1966 Kennedy half (FWS-50-1966-901) Will appreciate any advice.

  • #2
    Since the absence of designer's initials is one of the more common errors on the Lincoln cent, they are not cataloged as such. The two common causes for these missing design elements are; over abrading of the die in that area, which was very apt to happen in the 1980s and grease filled design element.

    The same can be said for the V. D. B. on the obverse die. The over abrading of that element has caused that design to disappear as well at times. However, not from being grease filled, since that design is raised on the die.

    BJ Neff
    Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

    Comment


    • #3
      no initials apparent

      thanks for the prompt reply. I assume from your reply, the 66 Kennedy was cataloued is because the kennedy is more rareomission is more rare. Appreciat your help

      Comment


      • #4
        no initials apparent

        [QUOTE=GKoehl;10137]thanks for the prompt reply. I assume from your reply, the 66 Kennedy was cataloued is because the kennedy is more rareomission is more rare. Appreciate your help.

        Comment


        • #5
          The 1966 Kennedy half with missing designer's initial on the reverse came from the special mint set for that year, which was supposed to be less prone to have errors???

          Since very few of that error have been documented, it is considered rare and has an added premium to the coin's (and set, if still contained within) value.

          BJ Neff
          Member of: ANA, CCC, CONECA, Fly-in-club, FUN, NLG & T.E.V.E.C.

          Comment


          • #6
            no initials apparent

            I must pull my mint sets out and check for kennedy designer initials omission.

            thanks again
            Last edited by GKoehl; 11-13-2010, 04:51 PM.

            Comment

            Working...
            X