Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2015-P Roosevelt Dime Interior Die Break Or Retained
Collapse
X
-
2015-P Roosevelt Dime Interior Die Break Or Retained
I put some circles around the areas in questionLast edited by Stachowski; 06-25-2015, 10:57 PM.Tags: None
-
-
50x doesn't cut it on this one, need closer images to see whats going on . I know the field is filled between the leaves on the acorn side and runs into the stem, where it looks like it formed a cud .. As for the olive side it looks more then just a die chip, not sure if the stem broke there and caused a cud too ..
Comment
-
Originally posted by diamond View PostThe term is either "freestanding interior die break" or "freestanding internal die break". In any case, they're too small to qualify, in my opinion. So right now I'm going with die chips.
Comment
-
Any die break outside the rim is a die break (or chip) -- no further elaboration like the term "interior" needed. It's just wasted key strokes that accomplish nothing. I consider the one on the oak branch to be a die break and the other ones in the olive branch, torch, etc., to be die chips but the difference is very subjective with differing opinions between specialists. I couldn't care less it you call them die breaks or die chips when they get to this size. Really, a die chip is just a small die break.Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
-
According to current usage (and not Alan Herbert's idiosycratic and confusing definitions) "die break" is a non-specific label denoting any kind of brittle failure that results in a void in the die face. Therefore it's desirable to be more specific as to the nature and location of the die break. So we have cuds (marginal die breaks), retained cuds, die chips, interior die breaks, retained interior die breaks, and rim cuds. Of course, collar breaks have their own set of terms.Mike Diamond. Error coin writer and researcher.
Comment
-
Mike,
I guess if making it that complicated works for you that's OK for you. I really don't see any use in elaborating on the obvious. But that's just my opinion. Using modifiers that to me add no value just complicate things. For example, your term "Marginal Die Break" brings up the thought that it is of "marginal importance", i.e, minor or that it affects the margin (or rim area) meaning to me a Rim Cud. Though, far from perfect, is the better old fashioned term "Major Die Break." It has shortcomings too but nothing as bad as Marginal Die Break.Ken Potter
CONECA Public Relations
Member of: CONECA-HLM, ANA-LM, MSNS-HLM, NWDCC, CSNS, NLG, IASAC, Fly-In
Visit my website: http://koinpro.tripod.com
Visit CONECA's Website
Unless otherwise noted, images are by Ken Potter and copyright Ken Potter 2015.
CONECA Notice: Any individual is encouraged to submit articles, opinions, or any other material beneficial to the numismatic community. Contributions should not be libelous or slanderous; ethics and good taste shall be adhered to. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official CONECA policy or those of its officers. The act of submitting material shall constitute an expressed warranty by the contributor that the material is original; if not, source and permission must be provided.
Comment
Comment