Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1930? Penny

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1930? Penny

    I have this 1930 penny that looks like someone squshed the 0 in but you can still see where the 0 was supposed to be
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 7 photos.

  • #2
    Things like this usually happened when the coins were rolled. The rolling machine would just catch the very top of the number or letter and shear it a bit. That seems to be what happened here.
    Bob Piazza
    Lincoln Cent Attributer

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah I seen that before but is ciunt on ok more like tze 0 was pushed in jot sheared. If it was sheared then it wouldn't make a line through the middle of the 0 it would have just have an edge on the 0 like ips not across it . That's good n my opinion I could be wrong but all the ones I seen have not had a line after getting sheared

      Comment


      • #4
        Either way its PMD.

        Comment


        • #5
          I am not saying this is a rare or an error coun. I was just showed ng it cause I thought it was neat and cool looking. There was not where you in here where I said It was. It's just different and ii just wanted to show it. I don't care if it t was a mint error or just plain damaged I just like the coin and wanted to share ut

          Comment


          • #6
            Micro analyzing things is not good either. You were given an opinion about it being rolling machine damage. Do you know something we do not... like It was pushed rather than sheared and you had never seen it quite like that before and that it never had a line in it before. How many of these have you seen before? If you just want to show the coin, then that is great, but if you want to talk about how exactly it happened, then understand that we are all taking a guess here. I stated very clearly that it 'seemed' like it was that damage from a rolling machine. If you didn't care, then you wouldn't have said what you did about another member stating it was just PMD. He isn't wrong.
            Bob Piazza
            Lincoln Cent Attributer

            Comment


            • #7
              I never said he was wrong I was just stating I never said it wasn't PMD or not. He just assumed I was arguing with you. I also was stating that it seemed pushed not sheared but it could be sheared

              Comment


              • #8
                I didn’t assume anything. Was just saying either way, its PMD. Bob gave his thoughts and you gave yours. Could be either, but both are damage. You posted it as a 1930? as if you didn’t know or thought it was something more than it is. After Bobs comment you were still debating. None of this would have happened if you said all this to begin with. BTW pictures in the right orientation are easier to assess.

                Comment

                Working...
                X