I thought I'd double up my greeting with my first question. I have a 2003-S 5C that has an incuse 9 between 'FIVE CENTS' on the reverse.
2003-s 5c reverse 9er.jpg
I know, it's incuse and the first thought is surely that it's struck through foreign material. You can see though that under magnification the feature has draft and die marks from polishing that transition from the fields and onto the feature. The image below has a gradient applied to enhance contrast with less distortion than actually increasing contrast.
2003-s 5c reverse_16x_c red.jpg
The feature is proud in the die. The die polishing, using a foam head and I believe diamond polish, leaves marks where die steel burrs are picked up and dragged across the die steel. The result of polishing on and around this feature is as you would expect. Smoother around the outside versus the inside of the feature.
You can also take a 9 traditionally used by the US mint and overlay it onto an image of the 9 on this coin and they align.
I have no clear idea why the mint would apply this outside an aspect of QC/QA for dies that need approval prior to release for production. This feature is very easy to scrape off the die and just as easy to dress the field.
I did send this coin for grading and an attribution to PCGS. It's been a terrible experience. Surely I could have taken a different route before PCGS but its the route I took. Specifically to have a third party crack it open to eliminate any suspicions of tampering.
They changed my order from Regular - Mint Error, to Regular without asking me. They changed it back when I noticed and asked them to.
I sent this coin still residing in a proof set along with the quarter set for grading for varieties, mint errors and attributions. Coincidentally all the other coins in this set have obverse and reverse doubling, albeit a couple are minor. Considering the 9 on the nickel, I call the 5to9'er, I wanted them to attribute all the DDO's/DDR's in the set as its soo unusual.
There was significant dialogue with PCGS. They mentioned a number of times they removed mint errors because it would cost a fortune to grade. Every single time I clarified that the money wasn't an issue and stressed my concern about how cavalier they were being with my order.
They confirmed they would attribute new discoveries.
The coins arrived back today all of them only straight graded. When I called they mentioned again that it would have cost a fortune to grade them that way. Ugh
The CSR also mentioned that one of the graders had been there 40 years and he said there were no mint errors and that makes zero sense to me.
I provided almost 300 images of these coins detailing areas of interest. (Please let me know if I can post a dropbox link here to the sets)
I am completely lost with this process. Do they not have access to key people at the US mint to ask questions for discoveries like this? How can you not see the 9 or this doubling?
2003-s $1 reverse_x_b.jpg
What am I doing wrong here? Thank you
Charlie
EDIT - I see that Coneca does attributions here. While I've spent a lot of time looking at coins it is obvious to me that I do not understand the nuance of the hobby of trying to bring coins to market, get attributed or graded. Thanks again
Comment