Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1956 D Penny - High Mint Mark

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Machtron
    • Apr 2022
    • 27

    1956 D Penny - High Mint Mark

    20220531_150814.jpg Hi - I've looked at many other pictures of 1956 D pennies and none of them show a miny mark as close to the date as this coin has. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? 20220531_150745.jpg
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3597

    #2
    Back in the day when they used to add mintmarks to the working dies, the mint workers were allowed to place the mint mark anywhere below the date, within the field (flat) area. Most placed them so they looked decent.

    The mintmark placement isn't a big deal until it's touching the date significantly.


    I have a handful or two of these, as well as have seen many others.

    I simply call them "danger close", but they do not have a high interest amongst collectors, nor are they worth much over face value.
    Last edited by MintErrors; 05-31-2022, 06:45 PM.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment

    • Machtron
      • Apr 2022
      • 27

      #3
      That's really interesting information - thanks for taking the time to share it.

      Comment

      • mustbebob
        Moderator
        • Aug 2007
        • 3050

        #4
        There are a couple in 1956 that had the mint mark just about touching the date. One of them is the very desirable RPM-008 where there is a totally separate mintmark in the field below the high mint mark. I can't tell by looking at this photo, but you may want to check carefully at RPM-008 and RPM-015 to see if this might be one of them.
        Bob Piazza
        Lincoln Cent Attributer

        Comment

        • Machtron
          • Apr 2022
          • 27

          #5
          Please excuse my ignorance - RPM means Re-punched Mint Mark but what do the numerals following indicate?

          Comment

          • mustbebob
            Moderator
            • Aug 2007
            • 3050

            #6
            The numerals are merely a running count of how many repunched mintmarks have been found for this date/mint. In the case I was mentioning, RPM-008 would mean this is the 8th repunched mintmark cataloged on the 1956D cent. Please be aware that in some cases, the 8th RPM catalogued might be different between each attribution service like Variety Vista, Coppercoins.com, and doubleddies.com. Some of these sites will try to cross reference the numbers, but that is a courtesy rather than a requirement.
            Some years, like 1960D have over 200 cataloged varieties.
            Bob Piazza
            Lincoln Cent Attributer

            Comment

            • Machtron
              • Apr 2022
              • 27

              #7
              Thanks for that useful and interesting information. I looked at the Top 100 RPM's linked from this sites home page and found RPM-008 but I didn't see RPM-015 listed. I'll keep looking. I looked at RPM-016 1956DRPM016b.jpg for a bit and just can't see why it's a RPM, I'm missing something. The others were fairly obvious but RPM-018 has me scratching my head. Unless the small ridge at the foot of that number is considered a D but that seems like a stretch from what I can see.

              Comment

              • Machtron
                • Apr 2022
                • 27

                #8
                Sorry, I meant RPM-016 rather than RPM-018.

                Comment

                • Machtron
                  • Apr 2022
                  • 27

                  #9
                  Here are a couple of better images of the mint mark. Unfortunately I'm not seeing signs of a RPM. Fun looking however. 1956DHMM.jpg Mon Jun 06 08-59-51.jpg

                  Comment

                  • MintErrors
                    Minterrors.org
                    • Jun 2015
                    • 3597

                    #10
                    Have a look here:


                    Gary Kozera
                    Website: https://MintErrors.org

                    Comment

                    • MintErrors
                      Minterrors.org
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 3597

                      #11
                      Ok, now that I see the coin, sure it is pretty close, but, that is about all I can say about it.

                      This 1954-S is closer, but again, it does not command any premium just because it is close...

                      1954-S Danger Close-x4.jpg 1954-S Danger Close-x8.jpg
                      Gary Kozera
                      Website: https://MintErrors.org

                      Comment

                      • Machtron
                        • Apr 2022
                        • 27

                        #12
                        Thanks for taking the time to review it and for passing along your knowledge. I'll keep searching for something better!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X