Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1970s nickel Mintmark

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1970s nickel Mintmark

    So I was going through some coin rolls from the bank and I we sorting , I noticed that these 2 1970s nickels mint marks weren’t even remotely close to one another , I’m a noob sorry I’m just curious if this is an error or if it’s just how things are with the mint mark so close to the rim and bust? Also does the one appear to be an rpm? Help please, thank you for your time
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 6 photos.

  • #2
    tbh, i don't have any specs nor have seen any governing mint standards as applied to mint mark/date positions and what constitutes an actual error BUT that being said, i would set the one close to the rim aside, unless i ended up seeing dozens or hundreds of them but even still then it is probably setting aside at the very least for a neat collection of far position mintmarks since the cost of holding it is face value.
    coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Igotitbad View Post
      So I was going through some coin rolls from the bank and I we sorting , I noticed that these 2 1970s nickels mint marks weren’t even remotely close to one another , I’m a noob sorry I’m just curious if this is an error or if it’s just how things are with the mint mark so close to the rim and bust? Also does the one appear to be an rpm? Help please, thank you for your time
      If you go into variety vista.com and select JN double dies 1960-2003,,,you will see a selection for mintmark styles, go here. Then you will see a section for (San Francisco) S mint, then you scroll down to the one that shows 1970 and it will show you pictures for the different S’s and locations used for that year.
      Last edited by Ronald; 03-15-2023, 01:33 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thank you both for responding I didn’t think of variety vista. I did look I didn’t see any quite that low but surely they are all scattered to a degree.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by occnumis2021 View Post
          tbh, i don't have any specs nor have seen any governing mint standards as applied to mint mark/date positions and what constitutes an actual error BUT that being said, i would set the one close to the rim aside, unless i ended up seeing dozens or hundreds of them but even still then it is probably setting aside at the very least for a neat collection of far position mintmarks since the cost of holding it is face value.
          I am setting it aside it is an oddity as far as I can tell I haven’t seen any quite so low. I thank you for your help

          Comment

          Working...
          X