Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

major clashed die coin?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    WOW!!!! There are so many folks interested in this coin I may have to get it appraised , the way they are acting it may be a million dollar coin.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by rascal View Post
      WOW!!!! There are so many folks interested in this coin I may have to get it appraised , the way they are acting it may be a million dollar coin.
      The only interest is how and why ICG got it wrong.
      Most fools think they are only ignorant.
      -- Benjamin Franklin

      CONECA Member
      N-4556

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rockdude View Post
        The only interest is how and why ICG got it wrong.
        Well then if this is bothering you two so much why don't you ask ICG before you end up sick worrying over it? there is absolutely no way in the world that you or anyone else can truthfully declare that ICG got this wrong from just looking at my bad photos. It is a possibility they may have labeled it wrong but IMHO it is a real mint error . this may be something that newbies have never heard of.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by rascal View Post
          Well then if this is bothering you two so much why don't you ask ICG before you end up sick worrying over it? there is absolutely no way in the world that you or anyone else can truthfully declare that ICG got this wrong from just looking at my bad photos. It is a possibility they may have labeled it wrong but IMHO it is a real mint error . this may be something that newbies have never heard of.
          Might I suggest you send the coin to BluCC Photo ( http://www.bluccphotos.com/ ) for professional photography. Todd does excellent work. You could even contact him via telephone to describe exactly what and how you would like the coin photographed.

          If not Todd, then there are other numerous individuals that are quite capable of photographing your coin.
          Lee Lydston

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 19Lyds View Post
            Might I suggest you send the coin to BluCC Photo ( http://www.bluccphotos.com/ ) for professional photography. Todd does excellent work. You could even contact him via telephone to describe exactly what and how you would like the coin photographed.

            If not Todd, then there are other numerous individuals that are quite capable of photographing your coin.
            Thanks 19lyds this sounds like a good idea but I have already had this coin looked at by a person everyone trusts in the coin hobby and he says he sees no reason to think ICG got it wrong. I would tell you his name but a bunch of nut cases would start on him like someone already did. actually I didn't ask him to attribute the coin as what I believe it is , I just asked him if he thought it was a real mint error or not.

            I have learned a little better how to get better photos and If I can find the time I will try to get you all a good photo that shows how the incuse letters are up tight against the coins rim with maybe even some of the top part of the letters missing. also we must remember that part of another incuse letter is on top of Lincoln's head.

            when BJ Neff get's to where he is not so busy I may send the coin to him and he does really good photos. I hate to keep sending coins thru the mail for fear of losing them . BJ is hopefully still my friend and also Mikes friend so surely we can all trust him. I'm totally sure that all of you that knows anything about coins can easy tell this is not one of the hammer job coins if I can get a better photo of it. getting photos thru coin slabs is hard to do.

            The only thing I don't like about this coin is the fact that it is one of those darn zinc cents.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by rascal View Post
              Well then if this is bothering you two so much why don't you ask ICG before you end up sick worrying over it? there is absolutely no way in the world that you or anyone else can truthfully declare that ICG got this wrong from just looking at my bad photos. It is a possibility they may have labeled it wrong but IMHO it is a real mint error . this may be something that newbies have never heard of.
              Good idea. Bad photo's. It will help in the furture.
              Most fools think they are only ignorant.
              -- Benjamin Franklin

              CONECA Member
              N-4556

              Comment


              • #22
                Ok guys here's two more photos of this awesome coin. notice that part of the top of the extra R is missing and it is not on the inside of the rim. this pretty much proves it is a real mint error regardless of what someone may say. also look at how adruptly the line on the memorial building ends down below the surface of the coin. plus there is absolutely none of the things that is always associated with the hammer/squeeze job coins.
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by diamond View Post
                  It's an obvious squeeze job. The incuse design elements cross Lincoln's face, which is not possible considering how high the relief is in this area. You'll also note that some of the incuse elements invade the design rim, which is also not possible in a clash. All other sources of incuse, mirror-image design elements (e.g., brockage, flipped over dropped filling) are also inadmissable. ICG got it hysterically wrong. This will be my only comment on this vandalized coin.

                  -- Mike Diamond
                  Sorry but I still agree with Mike..and also still bad pictures.
                  Most fools think they are only ignorant.
                  -- Benjamin Franklin

                  CONECA Member
                  N-4556

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rockdude View Post
                    Sorry but I still agree with Mike..and also still bad pictures.
                    You don't need to feel sorry about anything and you are entitled to your own opinion. I know what I have here and that is all that matters to me. My photos are good enough for someone that knows a little about coins to be able to see that there is no rim damage at all.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      The reverse is not on a horizontal plane with the obverse. The dies do not line-up (rotate) in Mint presses to strike a coin--obv vs. rev--at a 12 degree angle.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by cents1st View Post
                        The reverse is not on a horizontal plane with the obverse. The dies do not line-up (rotate) in Mint presses to strike a coin--obv vs. rev--at a 12 degree angle.
                        You sure have a lot of learning to do about coins but if you stay at it long enough you can learn. It is very common for the cent coins from about 1987 to 1989 to be struck with a slightly rotated reverse. you will find more like this than coins with aligned dies for these years. you mean to tell me you have never seen a coin with a rotated reverse. some coins have been found with major rotated reverses.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I am an ex-Mint employee. I know more about presses & dies than most. This is my last reply to you.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by cents1st View Post
                            The reverse is not on a horizontal plane with the obverse. The dies do not line-up (rotate) in Mint presses to strike a coin--obv vs. rev--at a 12 degree angle.
                            Ex-Mint employee or not, I have to disagree with this statement since evidence of rotated reverse coins is undeniable. They do exist which shows that dies do not always line up on the same plane AND they rotate.

                            Review this thread on the IKE Group Forum:

                            http://ikegroup.org/php3.0.2/phpBB/v...7f8dca3822639e

                            It clearly shows that not only can dies clash while rotating but they can clash on different planes or degrees of rotation.
                            Lee Lydston

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I am having a difficult time believing this is a clashed die. I understand that rotaed dies exist but you have to agree that even a 12% rotation is not common. Then you add in that the dies have to be "bulging" in order for the clash marks to transfer into Lincoln's nose area (where are the other clash marks from this "bulging die". Also, the so called clashed letters are off center from their normal position to the point they are entering into the rim (not possible with a clash) or at least near the rim area making it at minimum a misaligned clash. To me the liklihood of this all happening as well as it not having the characteristics normally associated with a clash is more than a stretch.
                              James Zimmerman
                              Coneca N-911
                              CONECA PA State Rep/Treasurer

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Zimmy View Post
                                I am having a difficult time believing this is a clashed die. I understand that rotaed dies exist but you have to agree that even a 12% rotation is not common. Then you add in that the dies have to be "bulging" in order for the clash marks to transfer into Lincoln's nose area (where are the other clash marks from this "bulging die". Also, the so called clashed letters are off center from their normal position to the point they are entering into the rim (not possible with a clash) or at least near the rim area making it at minimum a misaligned clash. To me the liklihood of this all happening as well as it not having the characteristics normally associated with a clash is more than a stretch.
                                go back and read my post #3 . there is another possibility for this to be a mint error other than a clashed die. It is definately not one of the homemade junkers where people smash them together.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X