Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1974 D 25c

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • vernesm
    Banned
    • Feb 2021
    • 230
    #1

    1974 D 25c

    ...if I didn’t see 74s quarters, I would never know that Washington supposed to have a eye lashes....Bob, is something wrong with a mottos or molecules are still trying to settle down after punch...

    post a picture
    Tags: None
  • mustbebob
    Moderator
    • Aug 2007
    • 3050
    #2
    I don't quite know what you are asking, but without being a metallurgist, I wouldn't think anything "settles down' after it is punched or struck, or at least if anything changes. As far as eye lashes, I don't know if I have ever noticed them, or even tried to see them. I do know that earlier die state coins and earlier strikes are more apt to show greater design details than those struck later in the process.
    Bob Piazza
    Lincoln Cent Attributer

    Comment

    • jcuve
      Lead attributer
      • Apr 2008
      • 1497
      #3
      Maybe a micro photo of the eye would answer the question. But the eye alone on a Washington usual does not show indications of an error or variety.
      Jason Cuvelier

      CONECA
      Lead attributer

      Comment

      Previous template Next
      Working...
      X