Thanks again Bob for always being ready to help and offer ways to dig a little deeper and learn something new.
greg
-
Thank you very much for the link. The die numbers that Ken uses on his for sale page is the Variety Vista number.
After looking at that link, I can tell you for sure that your coin is NOT RPM-001. The look and mintmark position are incorrect for that variety.
I am not convinced that your coin is an RPM because of the glare with the photo. I am adding the link for all 1962D RPMS listed by VV. You may want to check these and see if you can narrow it down.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Bob. Here is the link I found the Ken Potter posting. On this link it has a link to go back to his home page.
-Greg
https://koinpro.tripod.com › ErrorVarietyList.htm
Leave a comment:
-
You are correct in that the date has machine doubling. As far as whether or not it is an RPM, I just can't tell. You said you thought it might be RPM from Ken Potter's listing? Could you give me a link to that listing? I know of Variety Vista, Coppercoins, and Wexler's listings only.Leave a comment:
-
This is my first posting.
Here are pictures of a 1962 D penny with what I believe is an RPM. I was looking at Ken Potter's listing and this looks like one of the three varieties he listed: RPM #1 D/D east.
The date looks like it may be machine doubling, right? I'm asking these questions to clarify these things for myself.
Thanks for looking.
Greg S20211002_001.jpeg S20211002_002.jpegLeave a comment:
-
1962 D: I originally posted this in my introduction message, reposted here
This is my first posting.
Here are pictures of a 1962 D penny with what I believe is an RPM. I was looking at Ken Potter's listing and this looks like one of the three varieties he listed: RPM #1 D/D east.
The date looks like it may be machine doubling, right? I'm asking these questions to clarify these things for myself.
Thanks for looking.
Greg [ATTACH=CONFIG]n60542[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]n60543[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]n60544[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment: