Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1960 D DDO

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1960 D DDO

    What I have to be is a real genuine 1960 D DDO. I been to verities vista and mine one is doubling a lot more than what they show. Here’s my proof
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 6 photos.

  • #2
    Proof? Wrong. Not a proof coin and not proof of a doubled die. This is Machine Doubling along with some die deterioration and above ERT is die chips. Which I guess could be considered CUDs since they include the rim. Check Cud on Coins and see if there is a match to it.


    Yep, JC has them listed as CUDs over there on CUDs on Coins. I didn’t check that close for a match. That can be on you to learn as you go. Maybe JC will pop in here to help.
    Last edited by Kloccwork419; 01-14-2022, 08:57 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with Jason. Die Deterioration.

      Comment


      • #4
        We here’s what VV has on 1960 D DDO 001.
        You do not have permission to view this gallery.
        This gallery has 7 photos.

        Comment


        • #5
          And here are mine again
          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
          This gallery has 5 photos.

          Comment


          • #6
            I see what you are referring to. The class 8 doubling on the 6 of the date. I was focused on all the other photos you posted that showed die deterioration and the small cuds.

            Comment


            • #7
              I still would say No, this is not a doubled die and I would go against that listing. You can look at 20 1960D nickels and more than half of them will have this same issue on the 6. Go look at PCGS pics. Almost all of them have the same “doubling”. I dont agree with that listing at all and it should probably be looked over again.

              Comment


              • #8
                I actually agree with Jason on this one. I do not believe this to be a doubled die at all. To me it looks like die deterioration more so than any type of genuine doubled die. I will talk to the Lead attributer about having this one removed from the listings.
                Bob Piazza
                Lincoln Cent Attributer

                Comment


                • #9
                  I when to PCGS and did not see any coin remotely close to the one shown. I want you to show me a picture of a coin that looks like the one I have. I think you are all blind. I have two others that have what looks like doubling but you can really tell on them that they are die deterioration.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Cant help the clueless

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It’s not about being clueless it stating facts and asking the people that say they know something not to show the proof of there finding and knowledge. I at least show something to try to back up what I believe

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Here’s two pictures of a 1960 side by side and a picture of the PCGS and my coin together mine is the top right. Also you are all focused on the date. There’s other areas too. You all haven’t even seen there reverse side yet
                        You do not have permission to view this gallery.
                        This gallery has 1 photos.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
                          This gallery has 1 photos.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Let's not play games here. Be specific and tell us what you see. and what you specifically want addressed. You should only post one coin per post. You should not post other people's or clubs photos (copyright issues). Remember that you have the coin in hand, and we do not, so you have the benefit of being able to turn the coin in the light. Your montage have several coins, some of which appear to have MD on them. Let's get this post under control.
                            Bob Piazza
                            Lincoln Cent Attributer

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X